Check out the 990, they spend a ridiculous amount of money on government relations and lobbyist, but they haven't accomplished anything in decades.
https://www.arrl.org/files/file/ODV/990%20TAX%20RETURN%20%20...
Check out the 990, they spend a ridiculous amount of money on government relations and lobbyist, but they haven't accomplished anything in decades.
https://www.arrl.org/files/file/ODV/990%20TAX%20RETURN%20%20...
Also, it's very shortsighted to complain about "Total lobbying expenditures" of $450k over 5 years. For context, the commercial companies competeing for spectrum have spent billions. https://www.comparitech.com/internet-providers/isp-lobbying/
The 13cm band has lost more than half its bandwidth, cutting the band in two. 9cm is gone. I'm sure it would be worse without ARRL though.
I'm sure Congress is constantly under assault from commercial outfits who covet spectrum that's "just being used by a bunch of boring 90-year-old hams". Being able to maintain the status quo against rich and politically powerful telecom lobbies is an impressive feat.
Maybe I am making progress, they appear to have fired their lobbyist after years of not achieving any goal
https://disclosurespreview.house.gov/ld/ldxmlrelease/2021/2T...
You can search for the publicly available lobbying disclosure reports that every lobbyist is required to file.
Don't take my word for it: Add up the amount of money that the lobbyist is claiming that the ARRL is paying them each year. Then compare that to their 990. The numbers don't match.
Why?
For example, amateur radio operator day. I spent a lot of money on a lobbyist to try to get a day designated by Congress. Why?
For a hobby like amateur radio, defending what we have today is a vital and important role, even if expansion isn't accomplished. There's no doubt lots of value to be had for private companies gaining use over our spectrum.
Defending the majority of we have today is a worthily accomplishment in it's own right.
Based on the lobbying disclosure reports for their lobbyists over the past five years, and the 990s, I believe they have wasted significant amounts of money accomplishing nothing.
We NEED to open up more spectrum, encourage people to take up a hobby, teach radio theory, and operation in high school, lower the barrier of entry for getting a radio, there are many, many things that we need to do.
Wasting money on lobbyists while not achieving any proactive goal, such as a ham radio operator day, and spending $5000 a month to try to get that, is not good.
There's no way ham radio can have enough bandwidth to be the Internet, after all. And there's plenty of space for communications and experimentation as is, with lots of different bands with different characteristics.
There are more HAMs today than ever. If the ARRL were serious about policy reform, they would harness those Hams and the many vendors, etc instead of wasting money on a lobbyist.