I touched on this topic when this all bubbled over a week or so ago [0]. I got down-voted for somehow implying a comparison between H Epstein's pedophilia etc to SBF's financial crimes (which, looking back, was a rather hilarious and bizarre conclusion some drew).
YMMV. I wish you luck!
IMHO, I think that he doesn't have enough incriminating information about political figures to be "hit-able". He must have some information about the Democrats' shady financials, likely going way up, but let's face it, we all know that already. This contrasts H Epstein, who likely knew which political figures were pedophiles, sexual predators, and all that horrific business, which is far worse and likely led to the "anomalous events" that occurred during H Epstien's arrest.