> when it was acquired by a tyrant
Especially grating when you consider the previous owners were far more tyrannical for a much longer period of time.
Especially grating when you consider the previous owners were far more tyrannical for a much longer period of time.
- Opaque moderation (at least more opaque than the current one)
- Banning and shadowbanning users despite admitting the administration admitting they didn't violate company's ToS
- Soft banning users regularly so they could build a case to outright ban them once and for all
- Collusion with some three-letters agencies (see Twitter Files) to censor speech, bury newsworthy stories, etc
- Journalists were treated as a separate class above regular users.