Frankly, this is an illustration why punitive action against senior executives is the best way to prevent corporate malfeasance.
When you jail the literal person who committed the crime it’s not a scapegoat, it’s just a criminal.
Your suggestion doesn’t treat a company like a person it treats a company like the clothes a person is wearing. Commit a crime? Change your clothes. Company gets shutdown, assets gets sold to “company the sequel” execs are free from any criminal consequences and continue as execs at the new company.
> disallow them from making transactions of any sort
also
> When you jail the literal person who committed the crime it’s not a scapegoat, it’s just a criminal.
you're missing my point. they're gonna pin the "crime" on someone who wasn't a major contributor or decision maker for it. they aren't the real criminal.
Per definition an executive is a major contributor and decision maker.