Convicted for solving a problem the government refused to address
tomknighton.substack.com
tomknighton.substack.com
In my case, just googling the name of the town, "Wetumpka" and switching to the news tab, gives many versions of this story; in fact, little else.
I tried searching for the court records and couldn't find them.
Even the best story I could find had little in there.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/crime/progress/2022/12/1...
Then what does?
I would have welcomed an article about citizens fixing their communities and government setbacks associated with that. This article provides nothing of value except to piss people off using vague and misleading rhetoric.
[1] - https://www.alreporter.com/2022/12/15/opinion-wetumpka-cat-l...
What to Submit
On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.
"Please submit the original source. If a post reports on something found on another site, submit the latter."
"Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, ..."
That's not to say that I don't find politics or crime interesting. I even post a few on this topic when it seems to be a new development. However, this article seems to have an inflammatory tone with very little substance.
The mayor is powerless without his minions.
Seems to be the best writeup. Link from paulette449 at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34079667
https://acl.gov/programs/elder-justice/what-elder-abuse
It's not as if 20-somethings are running around sterilizing cats willy-nilly while seniors are jailed for it.
Humans require this tricky thing called "consent" that doesn't apply to cats.
The solution to bad laws isn't to not charge people who get lucky enough to get media attention, it's to change the law.
I disagree. Prosecutors have discretion over whether to prosecute for exactly these situations. You can do both.
I know someone who works at a company that used to be government-run until it was privatized and still internally operates along the same structures. Because there is little incentive to fundamentally change things, new ideas must always come from the top. People in the lower ranks are not just not incentivized to come up with new ideas, any new ideas that may be successful enough will be shot down and buried. The only way to implement new ideas without climbing the ranks yourself is to make your superiors believe it is their idea and allow them to claim the laurels if you succeed.
In other words: you can't just go out and do things. There is a process. And the process is more important than the effect, even if that process is defunct or fails to achieve the outcome.
It sounds like this could be selective enforcement - which is a widespread problem, but different from abuse. For example, they make a sarcastic comment about trespassing on public land. You can absolutely be charged for trespassing on public land if you are doing things you aren't allowed to do. That could be just being there after a park closes if it has hours. Or they can charge people who are hunting or trapping because those activities aren't permitted.
There are potential explanations that exist. There are also potential systemic problems here. But without pertinent information about the charges, testimony, etc we won't know.