When societies will intervene to stop suicide while simultaneously allowing for government sanctioned assisted suicide, it means that the morality or "rightness" of an act is only now defined by whether the proper paperwork was filled out.
It's moral to ensure charges go before a court quickly, it's immoral to allow a person to languish in jail for decades without trial.
Time and effort are a components of everything including morality. To dismiss time and effort as trite or irrelevant in nearly any situation seems abusurd.
Assisted suicide is (to my knowledge) aimed at end of life patients with terminal outlooks. People who have little chance of improving their outcome.
Self inflicted suicide is a much broader category including bullied high schoolers and unlucky stock traders. People who's current situation might look grim but who could potentially change that situation.
I won't comment on the morality of either, but there's more at play than just bureaucracy.
I do not understand your point. How is that any different than, say, driving my car down the highway? The same act can be fine if I have a driving license and not fine if I do not.