The most famous piece of art is the modern world is the Mona Lisa. Historical art carries much more weight than modern art in almost all cases. Just like we continue to examine and analyze historical events/people/etc, I don't see why we wouldn't also do that with art.
Because, We can't create new works of the past and we can't remix them to make something originally genuine with accurate intent.
So... what is it you're saying exactly? I don't have a time machine.
Both figuratively and literally, given that it allows you to control the lighting :)
> Because, We can't create new works of the past and we can't remix them to make something originally genuine with accurate intent.
I'm not sure what you mean by genuine, but changing the intent is the whole point.
> So... what is it you're saying exactly?
Exploring historical art from new perspectives is interesting and valuable.
It's valuable to you, fine. And some people critique its premise and existence. Why do you get upset when people critique it? Why do you dismiss any criticism of feminist thought?
And some people critique your critique. Why do you get upset when people critique you? Why do you dismiss any feminist thought?