I ask because I've read that in order for the SETI program to make a detection the signal would need to be much more powerful than the radio transmissions we currently produce.
I ask because I've read that in order for the SETI program to make a detection the signal would need to be much more powerful than the radio transmissions we currently produce.
Even assuming super duper alien technology that violates what we know of the physics of signals transmission that can pick up the faintest earliest human radio signals, our 200 light year shell is insignificantly sized against the backdrop of the galaxy at large [2].
Yes, if someone out there is broadcasting on radio frequencies, it would be the galactic equivalent of The Russian Woodpecker [3]. That's possibly a Kardashev Type II or at least a very high like 0.90 Type I level technological civilization accomplishment to put out artificial radio frequencies on the scale of naturally-produced ones.
There is lots of discussion on ideal frequencies to broadcast upon and look for [4]. There is even a discussion familiar to IT data protection folks that is the interstellar equivalent of a station wagon filled to the brim with tape hurtling down the freeway [5].
But the gist is we'd do better to reconfigure our economic north star upon moving the metric ass-tons of humans off Earth into habitats and working out how to move us around space faster and faster, than waiting for ET to visit us.
[1] https://www.quora.com/Radio-and-other-signals-have-been-leak...
[2] https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/news/a27934/galaxy-ma...
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duga_radar
[4] https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journa...
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstellar_communication
We're very close to being able to look for spectrographic evidence and maybe 50-100 years from building a telescope that uses a planet's gravity well for optical enlargement.
Earth already looks quite distinctive spectrographically because of the free oxygen, water, and CO2. In the general case you look for chemistry that is far from equilibrium.
Hubble already has the sensitivity to analyse exoplanet spectra, and Webb can do much better.
But some way beyond that, I'd imagine it's possible to look for spectral technosignatures directly. Artificial lighting, heat sources, and unusual non-biosignature gas combinations would all be clues that life exists.
I'm also fascinated by Przybylski's Star, which must be one of the weirdest objects in the galaxy. It doesn't take much imagination to wonder if it's an artificial beacon.
The Curiosity rover communicates with Earth from Mars with an antenna the size of a soda can.