I guess I can see it used in an infantalising way.
I guess I can see it used in an infantalising way.
It's an unusual usage. Fun Fact: "brave" when referring to male warriors is assumed to come from Spanish bravo which means "courageous, untamed, savage".
The association of courage and savagery comes from Spanish Renaissance culture and both meanings are meant simultaneously - that is, savages - those prone to violence -- were associated with courage and vice versa. Because English didn't have such an association, the word was repurposed to have two meanings and the second meaning fell into disuse after the 19th Century.
Now in the 21st century, unless you are reading a book written in the 1800s, when you hear "brave" you can pretty much assume it's an adjective with the primary usage.
The association of "savages" with honor and courage seems pretty universal. Like the vikings are often depicted with a strong sense of honor. Or the celtics by the romans, or the huns and mongols. Basically any tribal culture I can think of. While those living in cities / bigger civilizations are associated with corruption, deceit etc.
I suppose it's better to accept that both honor and deceit exist in all human beings, irrespective of group.
Used like you would use “warrior”.
> Played war games in the woods with his Indian friends
> And he built a dream that when he grew up
> He would be a fearless warrior, Indian Chief
> Many moons passed, and more the dream grew strong
> Until tomorrow he would sing his first war song
> And fight his first battle
> But something went wrong
> Surprise attack killed him in his sleep that night
> And so castles made of sand > Melts into the sea eventually
From Jimi Hendrix's Castles Made of Sand, one of his better and more underrated tunes.