The Netherlands Formally Apologizes for 250 Years of Slavery
time.com
time.com
But "reparations" doesn't mean only financial reparations, and don't let people focus on just that!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reparations_(transitional_just... describes "five formal categories of reparations: restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition".
You want unequivocal equality, which is satisfaction and a guarantees of non-repetition - yes, you want reparations.
Which is entirely reasonable and just.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reparations_for_slavery include examples of non-monetary reparations, this time for Africa as a whole, like "to use all lawful means to secure the return of African artefacts from whichever place they are currently held" and "an accurate portrayal of African history and thus restore dignity and self-respect to African people".
I can't help but think the idea of focusing on financial reparations is to keep people from thinking about all the other reparations that can be done.
I can't help but think the idea of focusing on reparations for slavery is to keep people from thinking about reparations for Jim Crow in the US (there are people still alive who suffered under Jim Crow) or reparations for imperialism (the Dutch decolonialized during 1942–1975; again, there are people still alive from that period).
And the point made is true - the Dutch profited from colonization, at the expense of their colonizes, and continue to profit from the inherited wealth of colonization. Why do ex-colonial powers get to hoard their stolen wealth?
Also, it mentions that in "Suriname, activists and officials say they have not been asked for input about the apology" ... why didn't the Dutch do that? Surely they must know it makes them seem like they still don't think of their ex-colonies as equals.
Do you apply the same viewpoint to everything else? When is too late? 1 year? 5 years? 50 years?
It took 45 years for Japanese American internees to get reparations. Was that too late? Should they have given up because they were living in the past?
In today's news, "Nazi secretary, 97, convicted for role in 10,000 murders at death camp". That was 75 years ago. Is that too late? Do you think the German prosecutors live in the past?
People right now are survivors of European colonial atrocities. Why shouldn't living Kenyans who were tortured by British troops get compensation for the Mau Mau rebellion?
> Why drag our children down with the ills done by our ancestors?
It appears that you want to teach our children that they can commit whatever atrocities they want in a less powerful country and, so long as they say "it's complicated" they can put off dealing with it forever.
Do you think the children of those tortured are so easy to forgive?
"Race" is a cultural creation meant to control people. I reject "white guilt" as being a meaningful concept since I've only seen it used as social control meant to keep others from doing what is right.
We need only to look at the long-held animosity between Irish and English to know that animosity does not disappear in a generation, and that "white guilt" is an artificial term.
The linked-to article at https://apnews.com/article/caribbean-netherlands-slavery-mar... says things like:
> “Slavery was a terrible period, and degrading acts were committed,” he said as he called for financial reparations to be spent on education, health and other public benefits. “We remained poor.”
> Irma Hoever, a 73-year-old retired civil servant who lives in the capital, Paramaribo, said that the Dutch “do not understand what they have done to us.”
> “They still enjoy what their ancestors did to this day. We still suffer. Reparations are needed,” she said.
and:
> Activists in the Dutch Caribbean territory of St. Maarten have rejected the anticipated apology and demanded reparations, too.
Why do you know better than they do?
mineral laundering, or the expropriation of African minerals and metals to other countries to disguise their origin, is estimated to account a considerable portion of the global GDP. if accounted for Africa would be a net debitor of the football economy; that is to say Africa would have the value role that the US/West currently holds. poverty, corruption and African war are all useful ways to disrupt sovereignty, undermine local growth, and hide the ill gotten gains from scrutiny. Western firms and govts still consistently do this across Africa to maintain the modern global economy. our technology-driven consumerist world wouldnt exist without this laundering. (copper, gold, cobalt, coltan, rare earths etc).