Because you don't need to.
The next big push will be audible AI.
The next big push will be audible AI.
But GDPR indeed requires it for many kinds of decisionmaking, no?
(Who will likely consult the computer and say no again, a month or two later.)
https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection/r...
> In addition, processing can significantly affect an individual if it influences their personal circumstances, their behaviour or their choices (for example an automatic processing may lead to the refusal of an online credit application).
Right now, I don't know any AI system doing that.
> In practice, legality depends on someone willing to investigate the offence and enforce the law. When it comes to the GDPR, that's not happening even for the biggest, blatant offences (Google and Facebook are still around despite breaching the regulation for 4+ years), so do you really think someone is going to bother investigating this?