Trump's Trading Card Grift Is Worse Than You Think
threats.substack.com
threats.substack.com
Super limited, best quality, get them quick!
Ultimately, an NFT is just a small payload, typically a URL. I'm always curious that no one talks about what happens if that website goes down or someone loses control over that domain.
I see two interesting things about this particular NFT release:
1. Trump sure does some scammy things for someone so supposedly wealthy. Would you, as an alleged billionaire, put your name behind something as cheesy as this fora (maybe) a few million dollars? It's claimed tens of thousands have been sold. It's not clear to who (eg Trump himself may have "bought" many to prop up the market ie standard crypto shady nonsense); and
2. The timing. Trump announced his candidacy for president last month. He's never stopped fundraising since leaving office. As a private citizen you can do pretty much whatever you want to with that money and it's clear he's used it as a slush fund for personal expenses. But that changes the second you're a candidate for something. Now campaign fundraising falls under a different legal set of restrictions. This really is more evidence of someone who is cash-strapped.
The art itself is particularly bad, like embarrassingly so. I'd be really curious to know how many genuine sales there actually are.
IIRC, Trump basically went bankrupt decades ago, and was only been able to maintain the aura of wealth by selling his name to be put on cheesy things (remember Trump Steaks) and playing the character of a rich businessman on TV.
I remain as convinced as ever that NFTs will never be mainstream. But luckily it seems that the parties involved with this shitshow are probably not concerned about that aspect.
" If any buyer decides to sell their Trump card in a secondary market, they don’t get all the proceeds. The fine print reveals that 10% of every secondary market sales goes right back to Trump and his fellow grifters."
I'm so sick of hearing about Trump, but unfortunately both he and his opponents feel it's best to keep him in the news as much as possible.
Does the video announcing this mess seem really weird to anyone else?
If i didn't know better i'd say the video was made under duress, at the very least to unwillingly fulfil an obligation.
Longest I've heard him speak somewhat coherently without insulting someone living.
AOC also sells a ton of overpriced merch to raise cash, so it's not unheard of.
So... this isn't an "either/or" situation. This is a "both/and then some" situation, and... I'm sure we'll see more variations on this until Trump dies.
Plenty wrong with Trump but also so many lies told about him just to fundraise off of and bump up clicks.
It's got an American flag on the side, but no tag saying "made in ..." anywhere. You'd think if it were made in the US, it would prominently state that. Of course there's no way to know if it's an "authentic" MAGA hat personally sold by Trump himself (lol), but it seems to be a representative sample.
I'd been holding on to it hoping to think of something intelligent to do with it, but that became a lot harder after Trump doubled down on the ignorant pandemic denial and trashed the economy.
This is where I stopped reading. The author clearly knows nothing about NFTs. Being able to earn money from secondary sales is one of the innovations of NFTs and is very common.
And in some cases totally dependent on the good will of the marketplace:
https://www.ibtimes.com/nft-royalties-debacle-enforcing-opti...
https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2022/12/02/nft-artist-royalt...
So he's doing an NFT grift. It's a spectacle. We all learned in 2016, or should have, that he's completely shameless and every scandal pumps up his base. Duh. This keeps him in the spotlight, pulling in cash without attracting the attention of the FEC. The details are irrelevant, except the salacious ones -- "no news is bad news."
He announced this time last month TBC to anyone reading
Though, I think what I said largely stands, with a slight modification: whether or not this is something the FEC can touch is something he can draw out in court until the money long gone.
Trump's base, as everyone knows but for some reason is unwilling to point out, is mainly white men and married white women. Clearly everyone is an individual and there's probably a single black woman somewhere who voted for Trump, but without those white voters he has absolutely no chance.
Why does that matter? Because they're completely disillusioned with him. The spectacle was well and good, but rather than focusing on the concerns of his base, like border security, immigration, creating blue collar jobs, and trade school scholarships just to name a few, his greatest achievements are Operation Warp Speed, which they don't like, and the usual tax cuts for the rich, which they don't care about. His main tangible policy that benefitted the white working class was not sending their sons off to die in a new pointless foreign war.
The upshot of all that is that you can rest assured that Trump hasn't got a prayer of winning reelection in 2024 and I'm near certain that his team knows it.
I think Trump is done, but Trumpism itself isn't. The base is going to look for more competent leadership, maybe Marjorie Taylor Greene, Ted Cruz or one of Trump's kids.
lol
People here aren’t going to like to hear this, but think less Cruz and more Fuentes for the future of what you’re calling Trumpism, but if we’re going to be honest we should just call white identity politics.
I just finished a reread of Anathem and it’s left me disinclined towards “bullshytt.”
It's a technology and business story of general interest. Right in line with HN.
It is unquestionably that.
Incredibly embarrassing statement for someone moderating this place to be making.
I mean, if you want to argue that the story is actually a substantive and intellectually interesting one, containing significant new information (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...), and it's just the title that's sensational-indignant, that would be fine. But that bar is necessarily pretty high when it comes to garden-variety political pieces. If it weren't, then HN would just be a political site.
Edit: btw, adding comments definitely does not help a post stay on the front page - see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34041016.
Why would I want to argue that? It certainty doesn’t describe the million identical ChatGPT circlejerks that rocket to the front page without getting flagged out of existence.
This NFT story was no less tech adjacent than them, and no less vapid and inane than them, but it had the appearance of being embarrassing for a certain hyperpartisan political segment, so it was flagged by a bunch of those supporters, and you in your infinite fecklessness are sitting here back-inventing justifications for this flag based on “well no I’m sure all those flags were about the low intellectual quality of the article” as if 97% of the front page wasn’t idiotic pablum aimed at potted plants.
It’s hard to take seriously the suggestion that you’re too stupid to realize those flags weren’t politically motivated and not just a comment on its indistinguishable-from-any-other-garbage-that-gets-popular quality.