[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennessee_Valley_Authority#Pow...
https://www.oversight.gov/report/TVA/Sabotage-and-Fraud
https://tennesseelookout.com/2022/06/02/tennessee-valley-aut...
https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/lawsuit-over-ten...
https://www.justice.gov/usao-edtn/pr/former-tva-senior-proje...
There are two individual people who happen to work for the TVA charged with individual crimes which don't implicate the organization.
There's a lawsuit from profit-seeking companies charging the TVA contracts are too long (perhaps true but there's no mention of profit).
Then there's a scandal about the TVA reacting badly to safety whistle blowers (bad! But also no clear link to "profiteering")
I think a more useful model is to look at what "the organization" does (as opposed to the people who work for it). For instance, Enron's business strategy relied on breaking the law. PG&E has been unable (or unwilling) to maintain its infrastructure to a level where it is safe to operate year round. These things existed outside of any individual crimes committed by employees (and it is useful to differentiate between individuals who are committing crimes in service of organization goals v.s. only for private benefit).
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/chinas-energy-transition-in...
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/29/china/huarong-lai-xiaomin-chi...