Examples of multi-dimensional voting:
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603656085390270464
My plane is not trackable without using non-public data (twitter.com/elonmusk)
Up in Elon Musk, Twitter, ADSB, Politics
Down in Truth
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33999983
The Suppressed Electrodynamics of Ampère-Gauss-Weber (2001) (21sci-tech.com)
Up in Physics, Fringe Science, Rant, Rabbit Hole
Down in Truth
There are lots of things that get lost when you are forced into a single dimension.There is a HUGE gain, and that's the fact that it forces the community to agree on what an upvote or downvote means, at least it should.
It has often been unclear to me why things get voted the way they do. Splitting votes into many dimensions might fix that.
the fact that something was used for a long time means only that it was used for a long time, and everything else is up for interpretation.
Is this the right thing for HN? I don't know. But they've decided it's worth the trade off, I think.
On a forum it really is much better when you give your 2c and then forget about the thread than hovering over it intercepting every new utterance. Time to close the browser tab.
It lowers the barrier to entry, coddling and inevitably inviting the lazy, thus nudging the needle towards the lowest common denominator, which is ill-advised.