>Since you bothered that much, why not kindly share the proof with us?

3/5:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33916379

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33366810

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31163090

>I cannot believe you without seeing the material that allowed to make you this conclusion.

You misunderstand something. I make no conclusion. "Based on that" refers to the thread linked. It is you making an implication. It is you that is supposed to be providing proof that those are the same people.

>If you don't answer, I'm afraid I might think that you weren't being truthful.

What's up with that? Is this an interrogation and wasn't aware of? But considering you knew they're 3, will call this dishonest.