Human ancestors may have evolved to walk upright in trees
smithsonianmag.com
smithsonianmag.com
This one, however, seems flawed on the basis of internal validity: what is the link between standing in trees and walking on the ground, let alone running? The fact that this is not immediately obvious means it raises a new question for which we have to invent more theories. Occam's razor says no.
If you find me dismissive, and you think surely the researchers have thought of this, I recommend having a look at the history of these theories, you'll notice their rise and fall seem more akin to fads than progress (much as predicted by Kuhn's Structure of scientific revolutions).
As the encyclopedia Britannica says: "There are many theories that attempt to explain why humans are bipedal, but none is wholly satisfactory."
Don't be sorry, be curious! The researchers have studied anthropology for a long while. Let's be curious about what they think and how and why, not impose our judgments upon them.
I when these conversations come up, I like to remind myself of the “stepping reflex” that new born infants exhibit.
“Stepping reflex: This reflex is also called the walking or dance reflex because a baby appears to take steps or dance when held upright with his or her feet touching a solid surface. This reflex lasts about 2 months.”
Source: https://www.stanfordchildrens.org/en/topic/default?id=newbor...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/20...
Likely due to the same reason - we evolved on trees before moving onto land.
And people love imagining the ability to fly yet as far as I know no one serious claims we have flying ancestors…
But the tree thing is something objectively measured in actual studies on a consistent basis across humans with different preferences.