> Billionaire's 501(c)(3)s aren't charities in the typical sense. They're tax-exempt piles of money that are controlled exclusively by billionaire and their families
Ah, so basically the exact same as every other billionaire family's charity.
Ah, so basically the exact same as every other billionaire family's charity.
This is due to the idea that you cannot get that rich without exploiting people, taking money from government (while simultaneously talking against people receiving help), and this charity scheme is yet another loophole that needs to be closed.
You might finesse your argument to the fact that you deem the level of exploitation and gains accrued to "billionaires" is too great for your tastes and that there needs to be a better balance struck.
If not it just reads as thoughtless criticism without understanding how are human systems work.
I'm ripping this part of OP commentary apart since it essentially describes everyone and not billionaires. It's a lazy argument.