Yes two weeks ago nobody had acted on the tracking info and attacked a car with Musk’s child in it.
But two weeks ago ‘abusive’ tracking using public info was still against the ToS.
Now the policy is clearer.
But two weeks ago ‘abusive’ tracking using public info was still against the ToS.
Now the policy is clearer.
1) Is ignoring that he asked for demotion of this account before the incident after saying he wasn't going to
2) He often lies about details and reasons for his decisions. Like saying the booing was because of a fight on the show we had video for.
3) There is zero correlation presented so far to this account being related to this attack
4) The ban comes too soon after a policy change without recourse, the account could for instance only post location changes with weeks delay, etc.
TBH, Im ok with limiting tracking of location but this guy is one of the richest man in the world and very public, there is public interest in knowing where he flying those jets to (he can still rent/lease, hide in whatever organisation structure he wants).
The policy is also not clear about what do to on exceptions and will not be equally enforced. "Elon is doing a show right now with dave Chappele at the X arena". Is this a violation? What kind of gray areas can be assumed will depend on how he interprets, etc. It doesn't really matter, it's his playground now, but it's hypocritical for him and he deserves to hear shit for it.
I am aware he mentioned it was a threat to his safety two weeks ago. Demotion happening a few hours before the announcement of the attack shouldn't be relevant.
2) He often lies about details and reasons for his decisions. Like saying the booing was because of a fight on the show we had video for.
Haven't heard of this, post the video.
> 3) There is zero correlation presented so far to this account being related to this attack
This is true, it's not directly related as far as we know, but people seem to hate Elon for some odd reason and he deserves the same level of privacy your and I do.
> 4) The ban comes too soon after a policy change without recourse, the account could for instance only post location changes with weeks delay, etc.
It was always against ToS to use public data for abusive purposes, the clarification is good. But I actually agree with this point - make the change then give accounts a few days to comply.
> TBH, Im ok with limiting tracking of location but this guy is one of the richest man in the world and very public, there is public interest in knowing where he flying those jets to.
No he deserves the same level of privacy you or I do. Rich people or other people that are disliked don't stop having rights. The delay satisfied the public interest question.