> "Years of debate among the group’s multidisciplinary members led them to identify a host of signals — radioactive isotopes from nuclear-bomb tests, ash from fossil-fuel combustion, microplastics, pesticides — that would be trapped in the strata of an Anthropocene-defining site. These began to appear in the early 1950s, when a booming human population started consuming materials and creating new ones faster than ever."
There's also just the sheer mass of material being moved and redistributed due to things like mega-dams, large-scale mining and earthmoving, construction etc.
> "Human activities have increased fluvial sediment delivery by 215% while simultaneously decreasing the amount of fluvial sediment that reaches the ocean by 49%, and societal consumption of sediment over the same period has increased by more than 2,500%."
"Earth’s sediment cycle during the Anthropocene" (2022)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s43017-021-00253-w
I don't know why anyone would want to deny this reality, other than to avoid international regulation of certain kinds of activities, like burning coal, for example.