> Or people could just not use the service and move onto a different one?
And people can just move to a different town, that doesn't stop us from having laws in place to guarantee rights in the current town.
And people can just move to a different town, that doesn't stop us from having laws in place to guarantee rights in the current town.
Towns are municipalities, twitter is a private company. The more I look at this metaphor, the less it makes sense
Town got pulled in when I pointed out that rights over speech wrt to these places still exist even though someone can move to a different town (to presumably gain access to a different town hall).