Does it? It doesn't to me. It feels like they've deliberately hand picked things that would rile up the base - dropping that the Trump admin requested content removed, but not showing that, then including an image of links the Biden campaign wanted removing, leaving out the fact that every single one of those links was non consentual intimage imagery of a private citizen is the antithesis of transparency to me.

Yeah, but they have to be open about present workings not just past workings. I'll give them time. If they can be clear and transparent about even this I'll be happy.

Yeah Elon might be a dictator throwing his weight around (I probably would too) but if there is due process and transparency so be it.

This doesn't appear to be the case. They state in the rules that publicly available information can be shared.

I'm sure we will find out one way or another what direction Twitter heads.

It seems odd to me that you would create an account tracking anyone's plane. That doesn't seem to benefit anyone but people have weird hobbies.

I had thought, and still suspect, that the Twitter purchase might be a vanity project for Musk. As such his motives are a little harder to reason about than pure profit.

While it might not have public good as a goal, I think that having Musk appear as a public hero of freedom might be a goal.