Obviously I can’t sign this contract. Has anybody come across something similar to this? If so how did you handle it? How common is this?
What happens, I had two say no way, one said yes. The two said no way, you move on.
One of the nice features of this approach is there is a clear signal about whether the company intends to enforce the non-compete that does not require negotiation after parting ways. If they are not paying you, the expectation is that you have the ability to compete. From what I have seen, the uncertainty involved in non-competes (will it be enforced this time?) has a large part of the chilling effect.
So you can sign it just like any other contract.
But you must first decide what it is worth, put a price on it, present the number to the client, and get back to what matters.
Sales.
Good luck.
I had an organization that said "money is not a problem, we'll pay what it takes to get what we want. Obviously you'll want to make up for opportunity cost and that's fair game. You'll be paid in currency X (non-convertible currency). To make it up to you for this limitation, we'll pay a premium. We want to be able to sell it to clients".
Negotiations went on to limit the sectors. I had architected the product so we would be capable to build other products, so it was fine. They had carte blanche from the highest levels of government.
The point is, the conversation was courteous and for every one of their asks, they'd add something along the lines of "you'll obviously be compensated for this ask as well" so they didn't even wait for us to feel we were taken advantage of. They were not predatory or haggling, and just showing consideration went a long way in how I perceived them.
Don't need to trust me. https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/insights/articles/the-ba...
> As for a time limit on a non-compete agreement, most employers see between six months and two years as a reasonable non-compete time frame, with one year being quite common. However, the time frame depends on the industry and type of career path the individual has. But the longer the duration of the non-compete period, the more likely a court will deem it unenforceable.
In California non-compete agreements are not allowed, and some other state have a hard limit on the length, eg, 1 year for MA - https://www.katzlawgroup.com/non-compete-agreements - and 2 for IL - https://www.navigantlaw.com/non-compete-2-year-rule-long-wil... .
To be sure, these examples concern employees, not contractors, but I doubt it differs. OP should check if 3 years is even legal in their state, and regard this as a bad sign about the client. It means they want to play hardball, so you as a client will have to be on your toes and play hardball too. Which I don't think is fun.