Panda Mini EV unveiled by Geely with 150km range price starts at USD5700
arenaev.com
arenaev.com
Not only was there a 4x4 option, but in 1990 an electric version was launched, which became one of the first mass produced car EVs - it weighed 1150kg and had a 14kW electric motor.
The current version is a four door hatchback, and still quite popular in some European countries. Perfect for driving around small Italian streets.
The hatch is counted as a door.
Also perfect for hooning around British B roads.
Also Fiat does not sell the Panda in China so no trademark issues.
These cheap Chinese EVs all just going to end up getting scrapped in 3-5 years or less and the environmental impact from all the toxic materials used in these cars ending up in landfills is going to be a disaster.
Personally I'd way rather spend substantially more money on an EV from a reputable brand (I tend to prioritize reliability first and foremost), as for anyone dumb enough to actually buy one of these lemons outside of China, good luck getting warranty support or after sales service or even parts for your broken car. Once your cheap new Chinese EV breaks (And it will) you won't be able to get it serviced, and it will just end up rotting away in a landfill leaching toxic chemicals into the earth.
We are in an age of disposable everything, and it isn't just the Chinese with poor build quality, this reduction in quality is driven by the private equity acquisitions and quarter over quarter demands. And this attitude that is ruining production and produced goods in all markets. When you can't innovate or continue to grab more of the market, the only way to increase profits is to reduce cost of production.
And you end up with a shit quality product.
I have to say I am very glad that I am not working on consumer products.
this one is $10k, double the 5700 but it has global ncap of 4. range of ~250km and the brand is solid enough to trust your life with (as opposed to manufacturers in india who have ncap rating of 0 and they still sell like hot cakes)
Public transportation is slow, especially if you are living in the outer parts of a city using a car can easily cut commutes in half. Those cars clearly are for cities, but if you think public transport comes even close for convenience, speed, hygiene, you are not using public transportation.
Remove all the cars, buses and tramway don't have to wait at traffic lights or behind cars, you can more easily increase their frequency and they end up only marginally slower than cars in a city free of traffic and faster than cars being operated in busy city and by drivers obeying rules. Especially if combined with other mode of transports (bicycle, scooters, skates...).
All the things that slow us in an urban setting like traffic jams, speed bumps, traffic lights exist because of the huge flow of individual passenger cars.
90% of my daily commute are by train. The bus is, if anything, slowd down minimally by cars.
Remove all cars and I am 2 minutes earlier at work, by train. If I use the car it is about 15 to 30 minutes. This is a complete non argument. You take a train because your commute is long, trains are not impacted by cars.