> There have been plenty of studies done with / in regards of masks.
But not plenty positive ones. And not plenty sufficient big ones.
> in a way that it was always clear from the beginning
It was clear from the beginning, that the IFR is around 0.1 and 0.2 %, with a much higher rate for old men.
So an appropriate reaction was for sure not the hysteric, fascist way.
> totally NEW UnKNOWN airborne virus
This is bullshit. The virus is from a well known family, and has just some new sequences on some of its proteins. Cross-immunity in many people was near sure. And at least the cleavage site of the S protein has a sequence patented (in 2016 by Moderna), so I guess it was not really unknown, either.
My opinions are less religious than that of most other people. Did you really dare to answer to one of the comments to your comment with a link to a press release of the MPI, instead of a peer reviewed article?