Assuming rational actors I can't see any reason to evade audits for years, even after litigation, unless the result of the audit would be bad.
1. Binance is run by criminals and all sorts of people would go to jail if anyone looked at their books.
2. Binance is solvent.
Not saying this is the case, but there's many other reasons for a crypto firm to be shady than their insolvency.
I can imagine that a full audit would uncover dangerous skeletons in the closet that don’t necessarily imply insolvency. At the very least, Binance made no secret of using extremely dubious banking relationships to collect money from its clients.
Audits aren't all-or-nothing, they've already paid an auditing firm to do a custom audit they designed. They could have made that audit much better without going into what you're mentioning.
My point was, even if the whole crypto ecosystem went to zero right now, the effects on the economy at large would be negligible. However, it would be the perfect scapegoat to finally crash the economy with no survivors. The media would not have a problem with just blaming it all on crypto: as you can see here, people are already very eager to do so! No other explanation needed to convince the masses!
It is bound to crash down after the last decades of reckless policies and all-around fuckery going on. So why not do this "cleansing" while blaming it all on an already hated scapegoat? It doesn't matter if it's not real nor realistic, what matters is the narrative, which I'm sure everyone ITT will gladly lap up!
The idea of using market cap as a frame of reference for crypto needs to die. There are much stricter controls about how a company issues more stock (and thus can inflate or deflate the price) than how a cryptocurrency issues more coins. Also, cryptocurrency market caps are denominated as an exchange of <insert your country> fiat, whereas a company's market cap is in the fiat in which the company is actually sourced (e.g. NASDAQ).
You just can't compare the two.
Say with Tether instead, if they invested in junky stuff but none of it went bust and they made way more than investing in t-bills or whatever they promised, then they may not want an audit to reveal they have 3X more than enough to cover outstanding tether, something t-bills couldn't have achieved.