Of course. First rule in government spending: why have one vice-president when you can have 14 at fourteen times the price?
This is why some people do not want small government. Not because they argue that large government is efficient or cheap: it’s that there are more checks and balances on power.
I think CGP Greys video on “rules for rulers” illustrates the point quite clearly. https://youtu.be/rStL7niR7gs
On the other hand, at the European commission, where the real power is, we don't have 14 presidents and there have been corruptions, serious corruptions.
The truth is that there is 14 positions because it was necessary to give empty chairs to all the political parties of the member countries. In Europe, no politician, no matter how many times he or she has been defeated or scandalized, has difficulty finding a job.
https://medium.com/@mikldd/data-salaries-at-faang-companies-...
The difference between an MEP and a VP seems to be 800€ / month, not a whole lot and it's a way for each party to be represented in the administrative body of the parliament
And we're talking about a European salary! Which they don't even pay income taxes on (only a small EU tax). So that's practically after-tax money we're talking about.
That can definitely make a difference in many European citizens' lives (although, not all Europeans at the same time, of course).
But if those 14 VPs were MPs then there wouldn't be the need for 14 other MPs.
Which means that the difference per VP would be the price of an MP + 800 EUR (of difference between VP and MP), which is exactly the price of a VP.
In other words, no, the difference would still be ~3.7 - 4.6 million / year in total.
First result on Google for MEP salary. Where did you get the 22000 from?
1. Daily subsistence allowance (~5000 EUR/month)
2. General expenditure allowance (~4300 EUR/month)
3. Travel allowances (up to ~2400 EUR/month)
4. Vice-president allowance (~800 EUR/month)
These are numbers for 2014, when the base salary was ~8000 EUR/month.
Since the base salary is now ~9400 EUR/month, you can probably add another 20% on top of the numbers I just mentioned.
That is, of course, assuming they didn't come up with more allowances since then...
Plus they get another 70% of everything they earned as a pension.
They also pay a small EU tax instead of a regular income tax like the peasants.
And I wouldn't be surprised if the base monthly salary was payed 14 or 15 times per year rather than the 12 that many people usually assume. At least, that's what happens in the European countries I've lived in.
On the other hand you can say that these VPs are in part responsible for the 2 trillion EUR covid recovery plan, which would allow 100% of the EU population to receive around 4500€.
Whether 14 vice plus one president is the sweet spot one can argue, but this is two vice presidents per political group in Parlament.
14 VPs is just a small part of the EU gravy train.
Now the parliament has 7 different political groups (fractions) and a bunch of independent members. Having two VPs per fraction is somewhat a compromise between true representative (which would need more people) or ignoring more (they are already ignoring independents)
And yes, of course, you could also force less fractions, but fractions covering too broad of a spectrum are quite problematic too (see spread in the two parties in the US system ...)
And in cost or whatever it is a small part of what parliament costs anyways and quite neglectible.