Why are scientists so dull? Because interesting people are selected against.
charltonteaching.blogspot.com
charltonteaching.blogspot.com
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/is-there-a-rol...
http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100318/full/news.2010.132.ht...
http://journalology.blogspot.com/2010/05/medical-hypotheses-...
http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2010/05/medical-hy...
Most of Charlton's critics are actually a lot more interesting and more willing to carefully investigate interesting ideas than he is. They just work harder at checking facts.
In view of this background, I tend to discount his public pronouncements as increasingly eccentric axe-grinding.