'Baby W' anti-vax surgery case
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
That said, if no unvaccinated blood is available, then you’re effectively deciding to kill the child if you don’t use vaccinated blood. I understand that this is their child but the parents can’t decide if the child lives or dies like this.
It’s a tough decision and unfortunate that one of the parents wasn’t able to provide the transfusion.
For whatever reasons, this was not considered to be acceptable by the relevant health services.
If we start going that path where do you draw the line ? Will one day people ask for male blood only, heterosexual blood only, republican blood only, &c. ?
From the article, it sounds like the parent's blocked testing unrelated to bloodwork and transfusions as well. Many hospitals are willing to work with strange last minute requests (to some degree), but if they were being otherwise difficult then that reduces any patience the staff has to go out of their way to accommodate anything outside of the standard procedure.