What comes up when you flush
colorado.edu
colorado.edu
[0] I admit, I might be showing my US based western bias here; I'm not sure.
“Achievement unlocked”
On the other hand it's interesting not just to see water particles flying through the room but perhaps also where they are coming from. If you design a toilet that sucks everything out first (without a splash) and the rapidly replenishes the water (in a splashy fashion), the percentage of pathogens might be much lower.
You could also just close the lid before you flush?
How's using the lid a controversial thing at all?
(Yes, the solution here is to put the lid back up when done, but then that ruins a bit of the GP's (I think) intended humor.)
Man 2x, Woman 0x = 1 "contamination" cost incurred Man 1x, Woman 1x = 2 "contamination" cost incurred
https://www.theunconventionalroute.com/men-pee-sitting-down/ or just search using terms like: men are learning to pee sitting down
Just like rules are there to be followed, the lid is there to be closed. Ordnung muss sein.
The parts of the lid that you touch to raise and lower it are probably relatively distant from the parts of the lid that would receive the brunt of any splashback.
In any case, just use a piece of toilet paper to touch the lid, if you are concerned.
When you move the lid, you only touch the outer rim at one or two places.
You can use a bit of toilet paper to protect your hands, and wash them afterwards, too.
Anybody know if commercial toilets in UK and EU tend to have lids?
Prepare to be amazed:
Toilets of the World
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20505602
(2019; 266 points, 190 comments)
For example, in some places this is normal and acceptable / desirable: https://toilet-guru.com/pictures/greece-kastraki-dscf1764.jp...
And they never have a lid you can close to avoid the spray.
What's the purpose?
The original intent was to make it easier for women to clean the perineal area without contacting a surface, and reduces genital contact with a surface.
How do I know this? My wife was on a safety committee in a past job where there was a workplace injury claim related to this topic. In our case, there was an automated toilet cover dispenser, which made the round seat code compliant.
Yes. But that standard is being enforced by laws (and perhaps other legal mechanisms) in many places in the US. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Plumbing_Code
Rest of the world? What about the places with squat toilets? Those are common in many places in the "rest of the world", and they don't even have seats!
Here in Singapore we have both styles of toilets.
Or perhaps even if they do spray in all directions it's not quite as horrible as it's made out to be.
"In Japan, these high-tech toilets are everywhere: hotels, restaurants, bus stations, rest stops and around 80% of homes."
https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2020/02/25/808791622/why-...
The quote is somewhat exaggerated but mostly true. I've even found the public toilets to be incredibly clean. While it is possible to occasionally find older porcelain squat toilets they are becoming very rare.
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=public+toilets+in+japan
>Žižek on toilets. Slavoj Žižek during an architecture congress in Pamplona, Spain.
>The German toilets, the old kind -- now they are disappearing, but you still find them. It's the opposite. The hole is in front, so that when you produce excrement, they are displayed in the back, they don't disappear in water. This is the German ritual, you know? Use it every morning. Sniff, inspect your shits for traces of illness. It's high Hermeneutic. I think the original meaning of Hermeneutic may be this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermeneutics
>Hermeneutics (/ˌhɜːrməˈnjuːtɪks/)[1] is the theory and methodology of interpretation, especially the interpretation of biblical texts, wisdom literature, and philosophical texts. Hermeneutics is more than interpretive principles or methods we resort to when immediate comprehension fails. Rather, hermeneutics is the art of understanding and of making oneself understood.
>“In a traditional German toilet, the hole into which shit disappears after we flush is right at the front, so that shit is first laid out for us to sniff and inspect for traces of illness. In the typical French toilet, on the contrary, the hole is at the back, i.e. shit is supposed to disappear as quickly as possible. Finally, the American (Anglo-Saxon) toilet presents a synthesis, a mediation between these opposites: the toilet basin is full of water, so that the shit floats in it, visible, but not to be inspected. [...] It is clear that none of these versions can be accounted for in purely utilitarian terms: each involves a certain ideological perception of how the subject should relate to excrement. Hegel was among the first to see in the geographical triad of Germany, France and England an expression of three different existential attitudes: reflective thoroughness (German), revolutionary hastiness (French), utilitarian pragmatism (English). In political terms, this triad can be read as German conservatism, French revolutionary radicalism and English liberalism. [...] The point about toilets is that they enable us not only to discern this triad in the most intimate domain, but also to identify its underlying mechanism in the three different attitudes towards excremental excess: an ambiguous contemplative fascination; a wish to get rid of it as fast as possible; a pragmatic decision to treat it as ordinary and dispose of it in an appropriate way. It is easy for an academic at a round table to claim that we live in a post-ideological universe, but the moment he visits the lavatory after the heated discussion, he is again knee-deep in ideology.” -Slavoj Žižek
Where's dang and his helpful links to recent relevant discussions when you need him? I'm happy to drop this in:
Why some feces float and others sink (phys.org)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33691619
https://phys.org/news/2022-11-feces.html
There needs to be another "fart content" dimension to the Bristol Stool Scale.
You then flush it and it fucks off into the abyss.
The reason for the "poop inspection shelf" apparently was so you could take a quick look at your turd and see if it displayed signs of illness. Like say, blood.
Better to avoid their kind of drivel.
They are also occurring in the Netherlands.
(Just a thought, loads of holes in it, but it may be true in some edge cases.)
Where is your toilet?
Though in my household I can say the door to the small room rarely gets closed and I can't convince anyone else to put the damn lid down. Until slurp-slurp-slurp the dog starts drinking it, in which case there's a "stop drinking from the bowl!" followed by closing the lid. I'm not bitter. I try to choose my battles, and "turn the fan on when you poop" is a hill more worthy of dying on. Still haven't really succeeded with the kids yet.
Windows also work well.
I don't think I have ever, in my life, been in a bathroom with a "proper" vent fan. AFAICT by observation, regulations must require a fan that makes seems to only make "chugchugchug" noises while seemingly doing nothing to the air.
Good bathroom ventilation is important. Controlling humidity is a big thing, but also properly ventilating things like acetone or hairspray or other things along with bad odors is important.
I do a lot of house repairs. I don't think I've ever seen a bathroom fan that goes outside except in mobile homes. They just vent into the attic. Same with many kitchen fans. They should all go to the outside otherwise they could cause moisture issues in the future.
I hate this type of setup, because it means I have to walk to another room before I can properly wash. Then again, I believe many people only use toilet paper in the US, so they are probably used to it..
They also seem to flush a lot more violently than residential toilets, relevant to the issue raised by TFA.
It is strange to me that there are two parallel systems. I imagine the commercial ones require less maintenance but are more expensive?
There's a lot more laws and regulations for the 'commercial' toilets. Eg the U-shaped open seat is mandatory for public toilets in many places in the US. It's not a choice they make for commercial considerations.
Btw, 'commercial' toilet is a bit of a misnomer: it's against the law to run a toilet business in most of the US. (Specifically paid toilets are outlawed.)
Most "commercial toilets" are designed to be easy to clean and run off of "mains" pressure - commercial buildings have enough flow that they can flush directly without storing a buffer in a tank. And many commercial businesses have normal "home" toilets, at least around here.
> This is an open-front toilet seat, and thanks to the American Standard National Plumbing Code, it’s the go-to for most public restrooms. This code was created in 1955 and further cemented by the Uniform Plumbing Code in 1973 by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO).
You can follow the links in the article I linked, or do a bit more Googling.
It's not a single uniform law, but a code that then got (and gets) adopted by lots of localities using different legal mechanisms. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Plumbing_Code
Apparently the u-shape is intended to allow women to wipe without touching the seat, and maybe also reduce male contact with the front. But you have to take a bunch of people's word (which I suspect to be guesses) for that.
[1] and I've been on standards committees where people are trying to imagine what the previous generation were trying to say, since standards usually only tell you what, and are short on the why.
No lids. In many places the law requires weird U-shaped open seats. Paid toilets are verboten in most places, too. And the cubicles of public toilets typically don't got all the way to the floor nor ceiling and even have vertical slits to peek.
An example: https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-VQ-IG8pFfcs/WQYWuWexVmI/AAAAAAAAd...
No, too much work? Instead just infringe on the privacy of everyone else.
Honestly...
But then again, I went to plenty of bars in college with trough urinals, so maybe I have a different point of comparison.
The clearances around the stall doors have never occurred to me as an issue. Nobody stands outside of a stall door with their face stuck in the door crack.
I've always understood the difference to be cultural and economics driven: US stall partitions are cheaper than walls and floor-to-ceiling doors; so the (cough) pooping closets really are only in upscale bathrooms.
(BTW, in the 1990s a Boston-area radio station used to broadcast bits where they would sit in a stall and strike up a conversation with whoever sat next to them.)
> (BTW, in the 1990s a Boston-area radio station used to broadcast bits where they would sit in a stall and strike up a conversation with whoever sat next to them.)
I'm British and I think we have just found the most important, deepest cultural difference between the UK and the US there is!
What lunacy. Mold grows easily (carpet was always damp in high humidity summers, due to condensation, near the toilet), and worse, one bad flush and your carpet is now literally encrusted with human shit.
How do you feel comfortable keeping it clean?!
https://up.codes/viewer/ada/chapter/6/plumbing-elements-and-...
You can often tell these people without ever sharing a lavatory with them - they'll joke about the woman/women in their life training them to 'put the seat down' (or similar from the female perspective) - as if that's all there is to put down, and consequently the women using it have nothing to close.
(It sounds like a weirdly niche thing to joke about, but for some reason it seems to be popular. I suppose such people think it's very relatable, not realising how exposing or even class-determining it is.)
Also given that the majority of people flush without closing the lid (I suspected this but just confirmed with a quick search) it's a bit weird referring to them as "these people" whose type you can tell. I don't think this habit is constrained to those who publicly joke about it.
I wasn't commenting on any supposed benefits for flushing, purely aesthetics and manners.
> [studies fail to show they] have higher rates of disease, or that the pathogen exposure
Nor did I claim anything of the sort.
> it's a bit weird referring to them as "these people"
Are they not people? They are certainly not all people. What would you have me say?
> I don't think this habit is constrained to those who publicly joke about it.
Nor do I, I said you can 'often' tell. The public joking happens often (enough for it to come to mind, evidently) and you can tell that about those people. I made no claim about the others - though if they're laughing at the joke that's probably a good indicator too.
You pee on a metal sheet? Fascinating. Does nobody wear shorts in Sweden? ;-)
Average bar urinal: https://www.sweppomn.se/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/14800038_...
Also yes, we do wear shorts, that's how no one sees that we've peed on our own legs :-).
And Lawrence of Arabia in the Seven Pillars of Wisdom. In which the young men piss on wounds.
"The other wounded men were seen to at the same time. Mifleh brought up the youngest lads of the party, and had them spray the wounds with their piss, as a rude antiseptic."
Last paragraph of chapter 78: https://www.globalgreyebooks.com/seven-pillars-of-wisdom-ebo...
My father would tell a story explaining why one foot was scarred and ticklish that involved the neighborhood kids pissing on his bleeding foot after stepping on a broken bottle while playing soccer barefoot in the plaza back home in Italy. All the kids knew to piss on the wound to sterilize it. He was born in '42.
What is wrong with all of you?
Edit:
* Here is one from December 2021: https://www.public-health.uiowa.edu/news-items/study-on-toil...
* Here is another one from May 2020: https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0013318 ("...It is clear from daily experience that flushing a toilet generates strong turbulence within the bowl. Will this flushing-induced turbulent flow expel aerosol particles containing viruses out of the bowl? This paper adopts computational fluid dynamics to explore and visualize the characteristics of fluid flow during toilet flushing and the influence of flushing on the spread of virus aerosol particles....")
"We" as beings are at least as much the micro biome that inhabits and surrounds us as we are ourselves. Sharing those pools of semi-independent life with each other; letting them taste the world we live in and adapt to the locale we're in today, is probably more important than we want to recognize. Closing the lid when you flush may well be a fundamentally uncivil act.
If a potential founder and creator is interested, I have a design in mind for the same. :)
> Researchers have known for over 60 years that when a toilet is flushed, solids and liquids go down as designed, but tiny, invisible particles are also released into the air.
Do we need to come up with something new? What if we start closing the lid that is already there before flushing?
At least, I’ve never seen a public toilet with a lid.
Part of the problem with any automatic thing is that it is more prone to failure. Toilets are so ubiquitous that if something like this were to have an impact, it would need to be close-to-unbreakable.
No this thread got me sitting here thinking about toilets and trying to come up with a design that solves this, and an outhouse comes to mind. <grin>
I’d assumed it was some standard pro camping kit. By no amount of searching just now has been able to turn up a device like I’m trying to describe!
The growth that occurs on the underside of the lid makes for a good reminder that cleaning the toilet is (over-)due.
You don't need to do this. Just sit, it's cleaner and healthier :-)
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/nasa-just-sent...
> "The new toilet is a compact cylinder standing about 28 inches tall and features the same type of fan system, as well as a funnel attached to a hose, as previous iterations. It also has a removable waste compactor for the astronauts to deposit their droppings in. Each time an astronaut poops, their business is sucked into a baggie. Once finished, the astronaut will seal the baggie up, and push the packaged poop down into the canister. They then install a new baggie and the process repeats until the canister is full. As the canister fills up, the bathroom stall may not always smell so fresh. The collection bin holds roughly 30 deposits. Once the bin is full, the poop is then discarded with the rest of the trash into outer space."
The idea of bags of human poop (including trillions of microbiome bacteria) floating forever in deep space orbits is rather odd. This seems like an orbital debris hazard?
This general concept is definitely something for us to consider but this isn't a specific case we need to worry about, I think.
Human spaceflights at altitudes beyond significant atmospheric drag would need another solution, but we haven't done any of those since 1972.
Great pun if intended
https://www.kohler.com/en/inspiration/intelligent-toilets-an...
Here's a video on one of SF's new self-cleaning toilet pods: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmFve_DI5mI
[Edit] The toilet in the video is not the $1.7M one, but it's a similar design AFAIK. The video is interesting for the engineering of the toilet pod. The $1.7M comment references a larger story about the politics involved in engineering and installing public toilets in the US.
“It all started with an enquiry from a nurse,” Dr Karl Kruszelnicki told listeners to his science phone-in show on the Triple J radio station in Brisbane. “She wanted to know whether she was contaminating the operating theatre she worked in by quietly farting in the sterile environment during operations, and I realised that I didn't know. But I was determined to find out.”
I was disappointed they didn't use a poop surrogate (https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/56003/recipe-fake-poop)
Office toilets are pretty bad- they really do churn up a lot more than a home toilet.
A few times I've had to reach over the toilet for a flush and felt a mist which roughly correlates to what you see in the videos.
Related: Lifting the lid on toilet plume aerosol: A literature review with suggestions for future research https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4692156/
I've kept my toothbrush in my bedroom ever since.
ref: https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/bs-xpm-1995-04-30-19951201...
Last time I checked these high powered toilets first suck things down, then fill it up with water.
The scary plume seems like a recurring pattern of scientists using scaremongering to validate the rationale for doing science.
I recall a similar photo of a scary plume of supposedly infectious COVID particles trailing a runner outside ... all that turned out to be nonsense.
No toilet except those found in airplanes can actually suck things down without first having water come in from the top. The sucking action is created by water entering the bowl and coming over the top of the trap, and the water exiting down the drain then creates a vacuum that sucks the remaining water down.
High-pressure toilets simply create more pressure at the top, they don't do any suction first.
(It’s still cool research just jogged my memory- iirc they had Mark Hamill telling you the benefits of closing the lid on the toilet before flushing.)
> Researchers have known for over 60 years that when a toilet is flushed, solids and liquids go down as designed, but tiny, invisible particles are also released into the air. Previous studies have used scientific instruments to detect the presence of these airborne particles above flushed toilets and shown that larger ones can land on surrounding surfaces, but until now, no one understood what these plumes looked like or how the particles got there.
Is also why I hypothesized that home spread was lower. Since many homes have naturally segregated bathrooms for kids over the parents.
Pretty sure this didn't pan out, mind.
Edit: I should say, as I realize it isn't obvious on reread. I posted this as an amusing confession. Not because I think it is a thing.