This is a misleading use of 'understanding' being equated to remembering.
The thing that made math so much easier to learn for me was that as soon as I understood a concept or method of logic, it was effortless to internalize and recall. Things that only depend on 'facts', like the meaning of понимать is what can't be understood and must be remembered. But if that was your native (or closely related) language it could be understood by seeing its roots and construction.
The hard part is getting someone get a foothold in an unfamiliar subject so that other understandings can be built upon it. What the author seemed to have done is two things: turn an aversion into an interest and realize that they can actually learn math, not merely memorized.