> Date reported: 8/24/2022
> Date fixed: 10/11/2022
> Date disclosed: 11/22/2022
> Date reported: 8/24/2022
> Date fixed: 10/11/2022
> Date disclosed: 11/22/2022
Unsure if it was backported.
Only the middle date is ambiguous anyway.
What does a full timestamp look like? For consistency I hope it goes all-in on being little-endian:
ss:mm:HH DD-MM-YYYYSo providing the day before the month does not provide any contextual advantage.
However, in most cases, the year is not necessary for contextual meaning.
So the alternatives are month + day or month + day and year.
If you don’t understand why something is done, but it’s been done for a long time, chances are that it evolved to be that way for a reason.
If something is arbitrarily dictated to replace an evolved system, there is most likely some information or practical purpose that is lost.
The good news is that GitHub Advisories are publicly editable, so you can always suggest an update to this one.
It's unambiguous and always sorts correctly, and doesn't contain any awkward characters. Objectively the best date format.
Of course, I later found out that is a standard format, and I suppose it's easier on non-technical people even if it stinks as a computer guy. Egg on my face.
11/11/2022 <- what date is that? or how about 02/05/2022? 2022-11-11 is not ambiguous.
and then there is sorting. if you have filenames that are in YYYY-MM-DD you get perfect sorting by date. MM/DD/YYYY you do not.
and its not just "euros" who do it that way - its basically the entire world outside of the USA.
If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.
"I'd never want to live in America. I'd much rather make a quarter as much money and live in a cramped pitiful excuse for a home. Free health care!"
> Date reported: 2022-08-24
> Date fixed: 2022-10-11
> Date disclosed: 2022-11-22