Hacker News Reader

Comment by mytherin | Hacker News Reader

While I can (unfortunately) see this happening - it seems incredibly futile and pointless to try and fight such an arms race. When AI-supported writing becomes the norm having students write essays without AI-assistance will be like trying to force students to do complex arithmetic without calculators.

Universities and schools need to accept that writing essays without AI support will simply not be a useful skill anymore, much like doing complex arithmetic without a calculator is not a useful skill anymore. Instead, they should focus on teaching students how to use AI support as a tool to write better, more comprehensive texts, rather than try and force students to write without it. That will ultimately make the students more productive members of a society in which AI supported writing is ubiquitous.

View on HN

>Universities and schools need to accept that writing essays without AI support will simply not be a useful skill anymore

It’s kind of mind-blowing that anyone could think this.

You’re posting on a website for essays. Small essays, generally speaking, if we restrict ourselves to the comments section, but essays nonetheless. You yourself just wrote one, because you wanted to express your thoughts on an issue and you wanted to solicit responses from others.

Would you be fine with a future where all written text on the internet, everywhere, was generated by AI? Do you not see any problems with that?

The point of writing is that you write to express your thoughts. Not anyone else’s. If it doesn’t come from you, then what’s the point?

I can’t envision a future where people voluntarily cease all written communication. Unless you’re a hardcore singulatarian, and you want to plug yourself into the Matrix so you never have to interact with other people again.

> Would you be fine with a future where all written text on the internet, everywhere, was generated by AI?

The whole point of this thread is it doesn't really matter what we think is fine or what we want. The future is unstoppable and these tools especially so. Adapt or die.

Feel free to express your thoughts. But I browse for content. And if AI has better content than you, then I prefer AI.

Note that if we're talking about triangulating human sentiment, it becomes a different story.

Who is going to write the content these AI are trained on?

I mean eventually AI will be writing most of the content.

By the way, that's not a loop. The feedback from humans will keep it from going full skynet-y. Also, the tweaks of all the little S/W neurons keeps it fresh too.

Don't you use spellcheck? word autocomplete? the bigger version of autocomplete that does the rest of the sentence?

Yeah, a whole essay is a lot different than just a few words here and there.

But a lot arguments here are that you have to draw a line somewhere between spellcheck and full AI.

And the article is arguing that you can't do that, there is no line. AI, just like spellcheck, is coming and there is not really anything you can to to stop it. Sure, you can be a digital luddite and spellcheck all your own words, but we all know that not going to cut it in the marketplace. Same with AI.

> Would you be fine with a future where all written text on the internet, everywhere, was generated by AI? Do you not see any problems with that?

if it makes the discussions more poignant and concise, why not?

Do you also walk every where? Or do you use a transportation vehicle? When a tool makes something better, there's no reason not to use it. The replies being written by an AI doesn't make it less of a reply - you can judge the replies objectively, rather than from where it is sourced.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com