Absurd. Making generalizations for members in a group is core to being a human, for better or worse.
There are some things you _shouldn't_ apply this to, e.g. harmful stereotypes, but it's not unreasonable to assume that men _tend_ to enjoy sports, or that women are more likely than men to purchase beauty products.
> core to being a human, for better or worse
That is not a free pass.
> not accurate to make generalizations
Making generalizations (description - when correct - of average, median, "mode"/type) is "accurate" by definition for the population, and incredibly stupid to describe individuals.
From notes:
Accuracy: correct results
Sensitivity: identified positives (True Positive Rate)
Specificity: identified negatives (True Negative Rate)
Precision: correct positive results (Positive Predictive Value)
Miss Rate: correct negative results (False Negative Rate)
False Discovery Rate: incorrect positive results
False Omission rate: incorrect negative resultsAh, but Jerred, I am not human.