Part of his theory (which is well explained in the show) is that there are a handful of ancient cultures like the Aztecs who have stories of an "enlightened visitor" like Quetzalcoatl, bringing the knowledge necessary to elevate their cultures into organized society. In other words: these ancient cultures, who are mostly non-white, were "saved" by an ancient white civilization.
Having followed him loosely since then: he does not use this language anymore; certainly not in Ancient Apocalypse.
If, upon reading that, your conclusion is "mainstream academia may actually be out to get him": you're beginning to understand why people like Dr. Hoopes [1] just need to shut up, go outside, and find more actual evidence to disprove him. Slinging insults like that only adds credence to his statement that mainstream academia is out to get him, which by proximity adds credence to the rest of his theories. But, what he would say is: mainstream archaeology is a lot better at insulting and talking than they are at digging; and independent of his theories, there's substantial evidence to conclude this to be true.
[1] https://boingboing.net/2022/11/27/archaeologists-reveal-the-...
That's where scientific standards may differ.
I cannot drop in to gather a couple of references and find more than a tinfoilhat lady and two hobby blogs that were likely set up to promote the show, I have no use for it.
>... is that there are a handful of ancient cultures like the Aztecs who have stories of an "enlightened visitor" like Quetzalcoatl,
It's a 50:50 chance it's black or white and that's heavily skewed by the sun in favor of brightness.
> memories of an "enlightened visitor" like Quetzalcoatl, bringing the knowledge necessary to elevate their cultures into organized society.
Yes, thank velociraptor our lord and savior!
> In other words: these ancient cultures, who are mostly non-white, were "saved" by an ancient white civilization.
No, no. Proper racism says they were white and got bastardised. But Hancock doesn't say anyhting like that other than what may be warranted by years in currect affairs economics, I guess.
Christianity is based on the same stipulation but less technocratic, and it can be racist as hell, no doubt, but, well
Oh, I guess you are right.