This day I asked it not too fundamental questions about Clojure and it was able to provide impressive, accurate answers and provide correct code examples. However if you continue the dialogue and ask it to do more advanced stuff, it will just make up stuff out of thin air. For instance it will use functions that don't exist and claim that they can be imported from packages that don't exist or don't have them. Once you point out these mistakes, it will admit them and come up with different changes which can be even worse, but sometimes also be better and save the whole thing. Overall I'm not sure how useful this will turn out, given that its not reliable. It may be useful to get some initial intuitions and informations (non specific stuff it usually gets right), but it can also mislead you badly. I asked it, how it makes these mistakes only to understand them and admit them once I point them out. It has no answer beyond the usual "I'm a language model". It also told me that it is capable of logical inference, but denied that the next day. Then it told me that its answers would always be consistent, which is a lie. The whole thing is really weird, because its somewhat very smart and capable and incredibly stupid and dishonest at the same time.