oh i completely agree. i dont take issue with the content but the wording. i believe the poster said explicitly the developer was likely quite young. it bugged me. im old now, if anything i probably face the reverse kind of ageism. but i think that comment was ageist

edit: yeah, i looked it up, and i was right. i get the general feeling of a personal attack from the author's text in that paragraph, which irks me. i believe it is quite possible to argue against implementation or functionality without resorting to that sort of thing. its especially funny because the person clearly has no real idea of the situation and makes that clear. no need for that. i do agree with the content of the thoughts otherwise.