Congressional Support for H.R. 3261 (SOPA)
spatialsituation.com
spatialsituation.com
We need to start being more pro-active about protecting the Internet, because it's obvious Congress won't do it for us, or at least not enough of them will try to do it. Otherwise we risk being in the same situation a year from now with a new SOPA/PIPA-like law.
[edit] searching for said data, I found www.govtrack.us, which seems to do mostly this. They seem to like the idea that others start using their data.
Everybody thinks it's somebody else's problem, and as soon as those somebodies else stop being idiots, things will change. Nobody realizes that they are somebody else's somebody else.
My understanding is that even if it is possible to lawyer it this way, it isn't the intended or likely outcome, that the law creates such an onerous burden on anyone getting a non-adversarial complaint about a client that they'd be forced to shut them down or face severe penalties.
As to what to do about these bad actors, I'm not sure what the best plan is. Would huge billboards with the Congressman's picture and "Adam Schiff supports internet censorship" get the message across? What's the most effective way to communicate to constituents what's going on?
Your intention has merit, but I'm sure some financial wizard could create some structure that had a much better return or utilization for that kind of money.
Is that really the case? Or is the data in the map incomplete enough that it only seems so?
You can see what some of the constituents are saying: https://www.popvox.com/bills/us/112/hr3261/report#nation
Note: POPVOX has an iPad2 app that seems to be filtering its way through lawmakers. The comments supporting and opposing a particular bill gets streamed into the app.