San Francisco and other progressive cities are getting the crime they voted for with defund the police politicians and lax district attorneys. Not all cities are experiencing these issues. Its a local issue from mid-guided policy.
Does it seem though that specific locales are disproportionately slipping back into crime "cesspools"? Could it be something like the "broken window" theory of crime or might it be areas of heightened homelessness where this is a problem?
I have no idea.
There are parts of this country that can be considered paradise in comparison to San Francisco.
https://cis.org/Arthur/Honduran-Migrants-and-San-Francisco-D...
https://www.singletracks.com/community/how-bike-index-used-f...
https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/alleged-internatio...
https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/san-francisco/sf-milk-...
I think it's insane to expect the SFPD to have the power to stand up alone to the kind of forces it's up against.
You barely ever hear local politicians talk about it even, I think they're afraid for their lives.
There is no American nobility who joins government consistently to make a positive impact in America for Americans.
Sure some of those are legacies, but many are not as well. Every Harvard class has nobodies from nowhere.
You just don’t see the same mobility in other systems. England likes their story about random boys drawing swords from stones and becoming kings, but that just doesn’t happen. Sure maybe our system is not 100% egalitarian, but it’s an improvement I think.
I completely agree that even an imperfect meritocracy of elites beats a hereditary one.