Hacker News Reader

> The author is not arguing in good faith (IMHO), and is mad that crank causes can't easily subvert a school district

And you're not arguing in good faith, by referring to the values of people you disagree with as "crank causes".

Sure, that's fair. I should have labeled them as people who are "deeply concerned about their entirely-imagined usages of cat litter boxes in classrooms". (source: https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/misinformation/urban-myth-litte... )

I apologize for referring to concerns like these as "crank causes"