That's actually sadism.
I dunno, maybe you just don't get it. Do you know what sadism is?
On the other hand, I've yet to hear a convincing argument as to why it shouldn't bother me other than "oh just get over it it's not that bad", which isn't working with me, since I have no petty bourgeois sensibilities, and I know what I'm doing when it comes to art.
Why should I be cool with sadism?
So it was a child carrying a doll that had BDSM gear. But that's funny cus if the girl was the one in BDSM gear, that would make it wrong? Is that the line?
I personally am not familiar with this photo and don't really want to see it, so yes, your comment could have mislead me.
If you are going to participate in this discussion, you need to keep up. You're attributing malice where there is none. That means you have to see the picture.
I'm not saying you can't say anything, just that I'm going to dismiss you out of hand.
Have you seen Big Daddy? The Adam Sandler film? Is that also on this level? Feels like the same thing. Child actors in an adult piece of media with sexual and violent and otherwise adult themes.
I want to know if you think it's ok if the kid wears BDSM gear. Yes? No?
Given that we're already talking about a hot-button issue which is the subject of conspiracy theories, that seems dangerous.
I do know I hit a nerve with that particular scenario. I got all I wanted. Ok, so let's just move on. Let's get to the fun stuff.
So the line stopped at her wearing the BDSM gear. Why? Why not cross that line? Why is it ok for the bear to wear BDSM gear and for her not to?
Apparently, if it was the kid wearing the BDSM gear, it wouldn't feel like the same thing. It would feel wrong.
Of course, if you, or anyone reading this feels different, speak out.