Gut epithelial barrier damage caused by dishwasher detergents and rinse aids
jacionline.org
jacionline.org
I tried many different detergents but never found one which didn't cause problems, so I've just continued to run an extra cycle. My GI doctor didn't really believe me when I told him. I wonder how many people are having their IBS/IBD symptoms exasperated by detergent residue left on their dishes.
I'm not sure if this will turn out to be quackery or snake oil, but the Super Gut book by William Davis makes some believable claims as to common causes of digest issues (along with solutions).
The key I found was at about the 2 month mark things seemed to be getting worse, but after that a dramatic improvement. I was able to stop the supplements after the 3 month pack, though 6 months on there was some regression so I'm taking another round (which seems to have improved things).
It might not be possible for whatever reason to sustain the culture in my intestine, but it's been the first actual improvement I've had in decades.
Available as BioGaia, I recommend trying it if you have IBS symptoms.
The first stage of resetting, as described in the book, was to rebuild the lining of the intestine. Forgive my imprecision in describing it, as I have forgotten the details and don't feel like digging. The issue is that many of our foods are made with emulsifiers (baked goods, ice creams, etc.), and emulsifiers cause thinning of the intestine walls. That in turn creates a less than optimal environment, causing losses of good bacteria as well as increases/movements of bad bacteria.
Fortunately that first stage is pretty easy - making clove tea with a couple other ingredients daily. I actually found it pleasant after the first few days. And then I read about clove tea and discovered that it's already a big thing, but where I grew up we've never heard of it!
B. I recently switched to a more “natural” SevenGenerations pouch and holy crap it’s been excellent.
C. You can not buy anything but pods at two of my grocery stores. You need to go to Walmart near me to find any straight powder. Market has spoken right or wrong.
You're going to kill some poor soul trying to clean all the baked-in francium and lions off their crockery.
Shame on you.
The pouches are still pointless.
We switched and it almost completely solved our "dishes not getting cleaned properly" problem.
Switching to powder has done a lot for us in getting dishes cleaner, and we can dial in the amount of powder needed for the particular soil level of a load.
The fact that it's cheaper per load, and the box fits more neatly under the sink are added benefits.
I call BS on this. The non-pouch detergents disappeared, that much I know. I strongly doubt people had stopped buying gel and powder. I suspect that some bright bulb at Johnson & Johnson or wherever did the math and realized that pouch margins were higher than gel and powder margins.
Fixed serving sizes force over-use. Lots of included water means extra volume and weight (perceived value) on the shelf. While powders allow measured use, and reduce turnover.
I buy 20lb boxes of cheap powder and they last for months. Hot water just doesn’t need that much help if you put some in the pre-wash too.
...is this a commercial kitchen? 20lb is like two loads a day for a year.
1. Burning the color of clothes.
2. Irritating the skin (hand-was was very common, it still has some use cases even today).
Also there was a move around 2003-2004 to increase the concentration of automatic washer detergents, that was meant to decrease the transportation cost for manufacturers, but overuse was even riskier. I know it was done, somewhere before 2005 when I left that area of business, part of the solution was a big marketing campaign, another part was switching to liquid detergent with a measuring cup, also including a measuring cup in the package with the larger sizes. I don't know what happened later.
? I still see them everywhere. And a quick Amazon search for “cascade complete” lists gel as the first result and powder as the third.
Powder is better. Pods are just powder.
Can also help to run/prime your hot water tap before starting cycle to start off with hot water (in places where it’s hooked up to hot).
Citrus acid does "WONDER" in shorten lifespan of rubber/plastic seals.
Apparently, energy efficient dishwashers have an energy budget per cycle and will only put a fixed amount into heating water, so getting hotter water into the dishwasher makes a huge difference in performance.
I would wonder if that happens in the gut too.
It is in many things. toothpaste, shampoo, dishwasher and laundry detergents, and lots more
Since people are trying to avoid SLS, MANY tricky marketing synonyms have appeared to obfuscate ingredient lists:
this seems to be almost the definition of evil
people are trying to avoid something specific that makes them ill, so they try to hide it from them instead?
scum
it's a surfactant
surfactants emulsify lipids in polar liquids like water
such emulsification is crucial to many kinds of cleaning
because cell membranes are lipid bilayers surfactants also can cause cytolysis, maybe relevant if you're trying to get bacterial films off your teeth, and sds is commonly used for this in bio labs
surfactants also often foam but this is irrelevant
i'd like to see one of those statisticians save an abscessed motherfucking molar though
anyway your dentist is probably not actually being bribed by tom's of maine, he just knows a lot of his patients had less canker sores when they stopped using toothpaste with dish detergent in it
because guess what else has cell membranes
https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice/safer-ingredients#searchList
Just seeing that makes me want to switch toothpaste. There looks to be an 'Oral B Toothpaste Pure' that doesn't have SLS or colourants, might give that a go.
Here's a non-paywalled copy of that same article.
I’m trying a SLS-free toothpaste now from a local company (again Australian) called Grant’s, but they only have one with fluoride, which has a bit of an intense flavour. But it’s OK. They do seem to have a US distributor but I don’t know if it’s available anywhere over there. Sensodyne as the other commenter mentioned does have SLS free toothpastes but I wanted to avoid some of the other things in it (not that there’s strong evidence against their use, but one ingredient, Cocamidopropyl Betaine, is just a potential irritant, I wanted to avoid the sweetness, and the EU has stopped allowing titanium dioxide in food).
I cut out SLS by purchasing Toms toothpaste, and that helped a lot.
I would still get them though, maybe twice a year.
The thing that finally fixed it was almonds. I stopped eating almonds and I’ve never had a canker sore since.
I have some amount of uncooked nut allergy and chocolate allergy that causes similar effects to SLS toothpaste. I'm still trying to figure it out.
I wanted to pass along this product I found a few years ago that really changed the game for me though, check out "Durham's Bee Farm, Inc. Canker-Rid."
This has been a problem for me since I was a kid, and all we had back then was Campho-Phenique and pain killing gels. Those things were / are awful. This bee stuff is absolutely amazing. 10/10 check it out.
Hardly ever get them anymore since when it was a weekly occurrence before.
There aren’t many SLS free toothpastes. In Europe I found Elmex and in the Americas Sensodyne (not all, check ingredients)
Things I've found that cause them:
- Pineapple
- Lemon/Lime juice
- Chilli
- Sometimes Chocolate
Things that prevent/reduce them:
B6/B12/Folate
Dawn is my favorite dishwashing liquid of all times, SLS seems to be the first active ingredient[1]. What should I use instead?
[1] https://dawn-dish.com/en-us/how-to/what-dawn-is-made-of-ingr...
Tap water in Sydney and most of Australia is excellent.
Then I moved to Houston. After talking with some water treatment engineers, I only drink bottled water here. Was very hard to change my habits.
Kindly elaborate! I live here, too.
In general I low-key proselytize the practice of removing excess stuff from air using HEPA and carbon filters to make a space smell better, rather than adding even more shit to the air (candles, scented sprays, etc). Also the benefits of using “free and clear” products. And using just water or water+soap with a rag to clean countertops/surfaces rather than weird chemical disinfectants that leave a microbial-toxic film of chemicals on the surfaces like Pledge.
I personally use marijuana-growing carbon scrubbers to clean my home air, see TerraBloom products. It’s made a massive difference for my family.
Currently living in an apartment. It scrubs the air really quite fast. Helps a lot with kitchen smoke, pet smells, cleaning chemical vapors, and new furniture/plastic VOCs.
I also live in the middle of a bunch of chemical plants so it’s invaluable for the 3-5 leak events we experience every week.
One of our cats has learned how to turn our HPA300 fan to “turbo mode” by bopping the correct button with his paw. This year he’s been an excellent early warning system for nearby chemical plant leaks and I’ve learned to blindly trust his judgment so I just turn the scrubber fan to 100% whenever the cat turns up our largest HEPA air filter.
I recognize this sounds insane.
- $199: TerraBloom 6" Silenced EC Inline Duct Fan, ECMF-150-S, 288 CFM, 36W
- $114: TERRABLOOM 6" AIR FILTER 24" LONG, 1.8" (46MM) THICK,
- $80: TERRABLOOM 6" AIR FILTER 16" LONG, 1.8" (46MM) THICK
- $3,000 (2022 prices): Siberian cat. Bought before recent price rises where the prices have apparently more than doubled, somewhat killing my dream of getting another Siberian kitten. Closely related to Maine Coon and Norwegian Forest Cat. Very very very playful and social. Enjoys playing friendly games of tackle with my Texas Heeler dog (50% Australian Cattle Dog, 50% Australian Shepherd), and often can be found entertaining itself throughout the day by training my dog. Naturally played fetch with plastic water bottle caps from a young age. Wants lots, and lots, and lots, of cuddles and play time. Our other Siberian, which was imported from Russia by American breeders, has had a very rough life and joined us late in her life. She has a very similar natural temperament. All three shed a truly totally insane amount of fur -- recommend Miele vacuums which are fully sealed with proper gaskets for maximum suction and minimum allergen leaking/spreading...Dyson strongly not recommended. He has had a lifelong fascination with dissecting electromechanical objects, especially air filters, and insists to supervise/assist with all maintenance work going on in the home. He learned that biting apple cables causes humans to stop using the laptop and destroyed $1,000 of laptop chargers when first generation MagSafe charges had non-detachable cables. Unlike his older sister, he has never had interest in killing/murdering animals, but enjoys removing all the legs from cockroaches and then playing fetch with himself by throwing the body around. Announces most of his poops with a loud meow and insists that the litter box be maintained daily. Enjoys training the humans, especially enjoys training the dog to get the humans to perform desired behaviors on his behalf. Contrary to marketing materials, neither Siberian is actually "hypoallergenic" in any sense of the word...maybe they're "less" allergenic but they still cause a lot of allergies and sheets/pillowcases need to be changed often.
I'd probably go 8" if I was buying today, I hedged a bit cheaper because I wasn't sure if the quality/performance would be what I needed.
Have you tried a water vaccuum? :)
Still, if you’re looking for that, edibles and temperature-controlled vaporizers are way to go.
Now that I know what my mother's vacuum is called I'm a little tempted to get one myself...
Agree with Miele ease of maintenance, though they immediately stopped providing OEM parts (belts) for the uprights the day they discontinued them. They still sell the expensive bags for them though.
If you get the filters and fans in the same diameter they will just slip together without any additional hardware. But it will be quite wobbly. I used velcro (monoprice, laying around for wire-taming) to secure it to a vertical bookshelf.
My BOM: - $199: TerraBloom 6" Silenced EC Inline Duct Fan, ECMF-150-S, 288 CFM, 36W
- $114: TERRABLOOM 6" AIR FILTER 24" LONG, 1.8" (46MM) THICK,
- $80: TERRABLOOM 6" AIR FILTER 16" LONG, 1.8" (46MM) THICK
I'd probably go 8" if I was buying today, I hedged a bit cheaper because I wasn't sure if the quality/performance would be what I needed. This has been running for 9 months now with almost no noticeable degradation in performance, although I'm not currently quantifying it. Eventually I intend to install 3 VOC sensors, one outside the unit near the intake, one inside the unit, and one outside the unit at the outlet....to measure the VOC scrubbing efficiency curve over time and assist in deciding when to replace the carbon.
We've been running it 24 hours per day, usually about 40% but sometimes at the lowest setting (maybe 25%) and sometimes at the highest 100% setting.
After 9 months, it can still use it for point sources of concentrated smells like soldering and it captures 100% of the odors. And this is operating in a high-VOC environment near a lot (dozens) of chemical plants on our side of the city.
The Terrabloom stuff looks higher quality and I can't compare it directly to Vivosun, but I've got no complaints about my Vivosun duct fan or carbon filters. I'm not necessarily suggesting one brand over the other, but just to add that you can run a knockoff version of this setup for a lower cost.
How important do you think the external fan is? (versus just placing it next to the modest airflow of a HEPA filter, as a sibling commenter suggested)
The insane thing is not your cat - cats are damn smart if they want to. The insane thing is that leak events happen multiple times a week and nothing seems to happen, or that residential zoning is right next to heavy industry in the first place. WTF?
I also constantly rant about the zoning thing. Even if you believe people should be allowed to live where they want, there should be more information provided to help dramatically lower the price of that housing but the apartments cost about the same as apartments in cleaner parts of the city 60 miles away.
Can you describe the massive difference it’s made for family?
Different chemicals cause disparate effects on my wife and I, but often manifests as anxiety, asthma, lethargy, general sense of being very uncomfortable.
Additionally we have two cats and a dog in a small apartment and sometimes they pee on the carpet/etc.
The carbon scrubber reduces the noticeable chemical plant effects down to just once a week, and greatly minimize that as well. Has completely eliminated stress caused by residual pet pee vapors.
We do have a bissell big green machine that we use regularly to clean the carpets and lots of HEPA air filters for dander, pollen, and other particulates.
But knocking out VOCs using a carbon scrubber has truly been wonderful. Works very very well whenever we get new furniture etc that offgasses for a week or so.
Would you mind expanding on that?
Every time there's some sort of "better smell" somewhere, where it's just "nice to have" I think: why? Why have this as well on top of everything?
We all gotta eat and doing something "meaningful" often seems like the worst possible way to try to keep a roof over your head. Doing something seemingly trivial that you imagine won't be controversial and that will be a "nice to have" for enough people to pay your own bills probably seems to some people like the best way to get by in this world.
And they probably didn't think anyone was allergic to something so seemingly trivial and didn't think it could be a big deal in that way.
Edit: I'm on your side if that's not clear. I spend a lot of time wondering how we solve this and my hypothesis is we first understand why this crap happens and I think "we all gotta eat" is, unfortunately, a root cause of a lot of ills in the world today and I don't know how we fix it.
> "we all gotta eat" is […] root cause of a lot of ills in the world today
hits the nail quite well I think. People are forced to generate income, even when that is to the detriment of other people or the environment. Natural resources are exploited without restraint, factories keep producing incompatible, low quality electronics and online services that harm mental health but create a profit are pushed onto markets with great vigor.
But with the advent of machines of human-level ability (physical & cognitive), within the next decade, human labour will not be competitive any more. This provides us a unique opportunity to overcome the traditional compulsions of our current growth-fixated economic framework and transition to a steady-state, cooperative economy (aka RBE) instead. That means leaving behind barter trade and local optimization for individual or company profit, paving the way to a good life for all, without time pressure and compulsory work. We (Open Source Ecology Germany) are actually working on getting funding (via PrototypeFund.de) for a cooperative economy simulation game.. To make it easier for people to imagine a post-capitalist economy and to start working on rules and organisational mechanisms for such a society. HN is invited oc ; )
There's a lot of commonly used chemicals that are irritants and disrupt how the body works, but are underneath the threshold of toxicity.
I take 1000mg of activated charcoal per day and feel better. It is paradoxical, because all charcoal does is absorb. It makes me think that everything we put into our bodies nowadays is poison. And if all charcoal does is absorb, maybe most foods are a net negative. My interest in fasting has piqued as a result.
I think we are entering an era of rampant industrialization wherein the products (food, soaps, cookware coatings, packaging materials, etc.) are not necessarily the best products on the market, but simply cost effective enough to put on the shelves--meaning if waste can get on the shelf through clever marketing and engineering then it will.
So waste = food = money literally without much processing, and effectively just waste = money. A process where waste conveniently disappears on paper only and is spread out over the lands without many people complaining. It is like waste processing of the 60's but way smarter.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/sep/19/us-state...
> * Professional dishwasher rinse aid causes cellular cytotoxicity and directly impaired barrier integrity of gut epithelial cells by damaging TJ and AJ expressions in daily exposed concentrations. > * The underlying mechanisms of epithelial barrier disruption in response to rinse aid were cell death in 1:10,000 dilutions and epithelial barrier opening in 1:40,000 dilutions. > * The alcohol ethoxylates, an ingredient of the rinse aid that remains on washed dishware, caused the gut epithelial inflammation and barrier damage.
It appears to be the rinse aid when used in professional dishwashers utilized in restaurants, etc, due to high concentration of the rinse aid contaminating the "clean" dishes.
> In contrast, the residual substances on the cups washed in a household dishwasher with detergent B were not present at sufficiently high concentrations to exert cytotoxicity and impair the epithelial barrier function (see Fig E9).
Home detergent does contain AES (sulfates) but it gets rinsed pretty well. However if you use rinse aid, the rinse water itself has surfactants (AES, more sulfates), which will remain on the dishware- that’s the whole point actually, so the water beads off.
http://www.rbnainfo.com/MSDS/CA/FINISH%20-%20JET-DRY%20Rinse...
There's enough here to indicate a need for further investigation, but not enough data to come to any overall conclusions about commercial or household dishwasher safety in general.
Tangent: most papers seem to do that… which confuses me. It feels like it’s basically saying to discard everything the paper talked about because to be actually sure you’d need to investigate more than they did.
Is it a pro forma formula or does it really mean what I understand it to?
Besides the inherent fractal nature of how science works, there is also an incentive. Being a scientist in a solved field is not very smart. Or even more cynically the 'further work' section says 'please pay me to do these things next'.
But I think the cynical view is not as important here. Research tends to be strictly limited in time, and for good reason. During the research you will probably find new directions, and also get insight into what old questions are interesting, or what new methods matter. All of these are great cause to include a further work section.
They are notoriously bad at removing food residue, which must be sprayed or scraped off before running. Anything more than trace is cooked onto the dishes. They're really good at removing thin layers of grease quickly, and sanitizing. Doesn't surprise me at all that they don't do a final rinse; handling stuff right out of them leaves a distinct feeling on your fingers, like the opposite of bleach kinda. You have more friction than you should until they fully dry, it's very noticeable.
1. Rinse plates before putting them in crates
2. Slide the crates into the washing machine.
3. Close the machine to get it to perform a 3-stage cycle over 2 or 3 minutes: soap, sanitizer (usually some ammonium solution like in sanitizing tablets), then rinse.
I was able to taste bitterness after the rinse cycles and we were never in a rush, so I had the habit of re-rinsing the plates afterwards.
In restaurants I notice soap in my water or on the plate every now and then. It seems like most people don’t mind or notice. If you don’t feel the texture change or taste the bitterness of soap, you can see it by observing pearlescent colors on the surface of your drink.
I never use any, and my dishes are completely spotless. 30 years old dishwasher, super hard water.
Specifically, you should:
- always fill the salt of the dishwasher's water softener once it's empty. It cannot soften the water if it doesn't get cleaned by the salt. If the water is not softened you will get spots. EDIT: Apparently US folks often have dishwashers which don't soften the water. Ugh. In Europe I haven't even heard that such a thing exists! :|
- configure the dishwasher to your water hardness.
- do NOT use detergent which is advertised as "you won't need salt". This is garbage for lazy people. It cannot properly replace the water softener. Think about it for a moment: The detergent is meant to fully dissolve during washing so you won't have it on your dishes after the final water cycle. The only way it could affect the softness of the water in the final cycle is if it did NOT fully dissolve in time. So there are two factors to be optimized which contradict - stay long enough to soften the water, but not long enough to leave remainders on the dishes. It will never work properly.
- This is not related to rinse aid, but you should know it: Clean the sieve regularly, at least every week. It will get ultra nasty with gunk if you don't. If you have no time for cleaning it, buy a second one, switch them once one is dirty and put it among the dishes so the dishwasher washes it like a dish.
I've never heard of either of these things before. Certainly not things on my, relatively fancy, dishwasher.
The water hardness setting determines how much the water softener tries to soften the water.
If the water isn't soft enough, it will leave spots on the dishes. Hence people use "rinse aid", so the improperly softened water would drip off before it leaves spots.
If the water is properly softened it contains no calcium etc. which could cause spots on your dishes.
I wonder if its based on average water hardness in the area. I'm in the north of England and our supply comes out of Buxton Springs (yep the same as Buxton bottled water) and is extremly soft so despite filling the salt it never asks for it to be refilled again as its not needed.
When I used to live in north London I'd be filling it up once a month as the water there is extremely hard - so hard that it'll kill your kettle within a year if you don't keep on top of descaling.
I'm pretty sure the majority of dishwashers sold here have salt compartments - I've never seen one without one.
Much of Ireland has very hard water.
But I think most people here in the Netherlands never set it up correctly and go for “all in 1” tabs. I never do, always set it up correctly. I do feel I need rinse aid to not have that nasty feel to the glasses.
Just small differences in water treatment and quality.
I know a few people who have a single outlet for osmosis water, I use a optional water filter in the kitchen outlet for drinking water.
But nobody I know is softening their whole water supply. Why soften toilet water? Why soften cleaning water? Garden water?
Well for the last 2 I guess it depends on how hard it really is
Softening cleaning water means your clothes come out - well, quite literally softer. And last longer.
It’s a great idea, given most municipalities have hard water.
Is the salt for doing a softening process that substitutes for a whole house softener if you don't have one?
We live in a place with hard water and have no softener in the house (you should see our electric kettle when we haven't cleaned it recently). Recently the accumulation of what I assume to be mineral film has gotten a bit noticeable on the dishes that go in the dishwasher.
The dishwasher is also 30 years old. Miele G 680 SC from 1992. Living in New York. Perhaps adding salt was more common in older models.
You might not have paid attention to it because your didn't know about it, but I don't think there are any dishwashers in Belgium that don't use salt, at least for the last twenty years or so.
2) IIRC, that house had a whole house softener.
It's not common in the United States. Some all-in-one detergent packets might contain some amount of dishwasher salt, though.
Here's a nice map [1]
For a random location. Comparing the water hardness map with a population density map it seems that most are living in areas with soft water.
Beads prefer Mg over Na but Mg prefers Cl over beads. So you can recharge with salt brine.
Or it might just be a concentration thing where Na / Mg ratio wants to be the same in the brine and beads. So you just give a really strong brine and most of the Mg etc leaves the beads.
The exchange of the ions is driven be the difference in concentration between water and resin surface. It works both ways, but Ca²⁺ is preferred (=stronger bonds) by the binding groups (e.g. carboxylate salts). That's why a concentrated Na⁺-brine is needed to flush out the calcium ions.
If US folks are looking for this feature, it can be found on higher end Bosch dishwashers in the US.
I have very hard water and a Bosch benchmark series. The water softener makes a huge difference. I don't want a whole-house softener because I don't enjoy the feel of softened water in the shower.
We now have a Bosch dishwasher in another house in NY state. The water is not hard (it's from one of the Finger Lakes), and the dishwasher does not have a softener, but we like the brand. After reading this story we looked up how to tweak the rinse aid dispenser and turned it down from "5" to "1".
I actually do have a whole-house softener which came with my house. I installed a bypass valve so it does not feed the pipes in my home.
(Aside, and I don't know if they are still any good, but these dish drawers are really well engineered. Mine had some problems early on that were resolved by small changes in the design, but FP provided me the parts to retrofit my washers. They've been nearly trouble free since then.)
I was looking for a fridge-freezer specifically, considered Haier but went with Liebherr in the end - I like that (in terms of white goods/kitchen appliances) it only makes refrigeration units, other than where you use them there's nothing tying them together in why a manufacturer would be good at making them all really, makes sense to specialise in refrigeration, or dish washing, or gas products or whatever IMO.
According to the user guide, a water softener is recommended if your municipal water hardness is >250ppm which would be quite hard for municipal tap water.
In my region of central Florida the city’s water quality report shows a hardness well below 250ppm, Which you can divide by 17.1 to determine how many grains of salt to take that with.
[0] https://www.fisherpaykel.com/us/dishwashing/all-dishwashers/
rinse aid is for hard water. restaurants probably tend to not treat the water and the commercial dishwashers they use probably tend to not have a provision for salt. they operate very differently than your residential dishwasher.
So yes, completely unneeded if you have soft water. Most dishwashers don't have a provision for salt.
Also completely unneeded if you don't mind spots.
I've only come across this in Spain so far. Never seen in Norway. But maybe I just haven't been paying attention. Then again, the water in Norway in :chefskiss:
This is the real key, modern dishwashers have so many limitations in an attempt to reduce water and power usage they do an awful job. I wish there was more information on how to disable these features.
"The residue remaining after the rinse cycle varies between 1:250 to 1:667 for the dishwasher detergent and 1:2,000 to 1:10,000 dilutions for the rinse aid."
This is actually an uncited claim in the paper, and the paper authors did not test it. "In the present study, we hypothesized that if the detergent and rinse aid residues are not completely removed, once dry, they may remain on the surface of the dishware."
But then they go on to only test what would happen to gut lining cells if most dishes most of the time had residue on them in such concentrations as they assume would be present, transfer to the food, and make it past the stomach.This line of research really should have started with something like,
"we swabbed 50 recently washed and dried dishes from 25 different restaurants using different dish-washing machines. Here is the average concentration of detergent and rinse aid residue on the dry dishes".
I get that's not the study they wanted to do, of course; who wants to spend hours and days swabbing dry dishes when you have a decent reason to play with new biotech?But that means the only thing this paper actually looked at is: IF there is residue on the dry dishes, and IF that remains in the assumed concentrations by the time you eat off of it, and IF all of that residue ends up attached to your food, and IF all those chemicals make it past your stomach, let's see what that might do to your gut lining.
Not a bad idea for a study, but definitely not what people on the internet are taking this to be.
The news articles are promoting that unsupported claim to an assumed fact that there is chemical residue on all the dishes people are eating from and that this is destroying people's gut lining. Most of the headlines around this are something to the effect of: "Commercial Dishwashers Destroy Protective Layer in Gut".
Which is pure sensationalism, the paper authors never claim this and this idea is not supported by present evidence.
I agree with what you’re saying here in terms of the raw findings, but I wonder if as a society we’re approaching this question wrong. Specifically: if I proved that dishwasher detergents contained a toxic chemical (say: arsenic), shouldn’t dishwasher detergent makers now bear the burden of proof for demonstrating that it doesn’t remain on dishes? And isn’t it reasonable for people to treat this as major, worrying news just based on the precautionary principle?
I use the pods most often but I've found that cascade platinum leaves more noticeable residue then quantum but I may actually switch to something else entirely. The problem is if I use anything besides these two my dishes don't get as clean. The pods are also difficult to chop in half.
I think the manufacturers need to create a low dose high efficiency detergent. There's probably a formula and I bet cascade platinum and the quantum are optimized for an older generation of washers that use more water.
For this specific case, I'd still rather see the evidence that most dishwashers, when used according to manufacturer operating instructions (or even when used as most people operate them in practice) actually do leave enough dangerous chemical residue on the dishware to be a risk and that significant amounts of this stuff transfers to food before I'd say it's a claim the manufacturers have a burden of defending. Similar claims could be made about ceramics and glazing for instance, and the ceramics would harm us if ingested, but there's no evidence that ceramics from plates transfer to foods as we eat, even if we cut food on the plate with a knife. Of course, ceramics don't tend to dissolve readily in water either so we can presume detergents and rinse aids have some higher chance of transferring to food if present.
Of course the reality is, if enough people take the sensationalist headlines seriously, the manufacturers will have to defend it anyway; but this effect is what makes organization leaders assume most people are too stupid to hear the truth about nearly anything and the root cause of things like bad nutritional advice recycling over and over again.
Many people are still afraid of stuff like MSG, even though it occurs naturally in many foods and has been proven safe over and over again. The root cause of that scare was a science article in the New England Journal of Medicine back in 1968 which was sensationalized by the New York Times. Bad memes like "Chinese Restaurant Syndrome" are prevalent enough throughout the history of scientific literature to merit an equal portion of caution before reacting to any single paper with too little skepticism or too much drive to change our lifestyles or behaviors.
As far as MSG goes I’m not sure what that has to do with this issue. Clearly it would have been better if MSG had been well-studied early on, before concerns about it spread widely. This seems like an argument for investing in studies early. But even aside from that: this is not MSG. It’s a toxic ingredient that may or may not evaporate.
The problem is, people can be wrong. Scientists have bias too. Sometimes people see trends in data not because it's valid but because that's what they were consciously or sub-consciously hoping to find. Even on review of the work by industry and regulatory panels, people still make mistakes. Products still sometimes have effects no one knew about or intended. On top of that, everything is lethal in sufficient quantities. Even water will kill you through electrolyte depletion if you drink enough a once.
My point is just that science is hard, studies are deliberately narrow and careful to try and add one tiny little fact to the pile of all human knowledge. And even then, most early findings turn out to be wrong in various ways or get refined in a way that makes excited reactions later seem overblown. It takes a long time to prove anything like the broad statements we tend to find in sensationalized news coverage. So while caution is fine, immediately assuming that one small study just recently published, yet to be replicated successfully, using a methodology that leaves a huge number of variables open to question between the lab environment and the real world use cases, is just not something to get too excited about.
Maybe the companies that work on rinse aids will want to follow up this line of research and answer some of those questions...but let's be honest, if you're already assuming the product is harmful based sensationalized news, are any follow up papers funded by the interested parties really going to change your mind? Are you even going to look for those papers six months to a year after you toss out your rise aid and demand your favorite restaurants do the same?
If you want to find the studies you would like industry to be doing, I'm sure they are available. Most of the scientific studies out there have something to do with testing products that exist or finding new things to make into new products.
It's just that most studies of anything at all are not terribly sensational. Like, how boring a headline is "dish soap company finds new detergent compound that binds to grease 2% better than the most commonly used compound, no immediately obvious side-effects, more study needed for FDA approval"?
Much like yogurt, it's made by fermentation. Much like table salt, it was discovered to be delicious by people putting just about everything in their mouths back in the day. It can be said that MSG was in the process of being well-studied early on when the sensationalized news fouled up the whole process and made people unnecessarily afraid of something no more harmful than table salt.
Decades and tens to hundreds of papers later, the sensationalized story is still winning in the minds of people who don't understand how science works and don't know where most of the stuff around them comes from. This is the problem with overreacting to a headline. You might be doing yourself a favor health wise, possibly, but you might also be demanding millions of restaurants redesign their menus to feed you less healthy, less delicious food, for no good reason.
The problem is, you don't know. That's why it's okay to take a single paper with a grain of salt.
It’s a good way to begin exploring it.
>Enterocytic liquid-liquid interfaces were established on permeable supports
https://bioduro-sundia.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/caco-2...
This is like a fake very fragile layer of cells cultured on a membrane. It’s good for preliminary data but it needs follow up data in vivo.
Caveats off the top of my head-
1. Your real gut is massively more robust than Caco-2 cells grown as a monolayer on a support. You’ve got blood supply, lympathic system, villi and connective tissue, layer upon layer of cells covered in mucus- just a completely different ballgame.
2. Rinse aid would first go through your stomach, exposed to acid, be absorbed maybe, have pancreatic secretions added to it, have food with it and all the lipids, very long list.
3. What’s the concentration of rinse aid you actually absorb from your dishes? 1:20,000 doesn’t seem like enough dilution to me but maybe they address that.
Nevertheless I won’t use rinse aid again. :) It’s not necessary for my dishes and it isn’t even worth the cost.
> A professional dishwasher completes 1 or 2 wash and rinse cycles using 3.5 L of water per cycle. The detergent and rinse aid are automatically dispensed into the water at a concentration of 1.5 to 4 mL/L and 0.1 to 0.5 mL/L, respectively. At these concentrations, the residual dilution factor after rinse ranges from 1:250 to 1:667 for detergents and 1:2,000 to 1:10,000 for rinse aids.
So 1:10,000 is a plausible dilution of rinse aid in the rinse water. Unless people are drinking the rinse water (please don't), it's not a dilution that will ever be seen by the body.
Rather, what the body will see is however much residue is left on a mug diluted in whatever the volume of the mug is.
They do sort of address this:
> To study the chemicals in the residue remaining on the surface of dishware after washing, 10 porcelain cups (190 mL size) were subjected to 1 full washing and drying cycle in professional (Winterhalter, GS501, Germany) and household (AEG, GS60AV, Poland) dishwashers and then 1 mL of culture medium was added into them. After shaking and waiting for 5 minutes, the culture medium was collected from the cups, filter-sterilized, and added to the monolayer and differentiated cell cultures directly or in 1:2, 1:5, and 1:10 dilutions.
Except that they wash all the residues off in just 1 ml of medium. They then dilute that 1 ml onto cells:
> The LDH cytotoxicity assay on monolayer Caco-2 cells showed that the toxicity exerted by the dried rinse aid residue on the cups washed in a professional dishwasher still takes place even at a 1:10 dilution (see Fig E9, A). TEER and PF were also measured in differentiated Caco-2 cells, and parallel results were observed when exposed to rinse aid. High concentrations (1:2 and 1:5 dilutions) of the residue severely impaired the epithelial barrier function as measured by the decreased TEER values. In the 1:10 dilution, nearly the same TEER values were observed compared with controls.
So this isn't great, but it also doesn't seem like a big deal. You could rinse a cup in 10 ml of water, gargle with it, and be fine.
Gas stoves and ovens are the other thing we stopped using, with good justification I think.
Most people keyed into this from the Vox article:
https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2020/5/7/21247602...
Which links to:
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1172959
As evidence for the claim that Gas range put out more PM2.5
But if you consult table 3 of that article you will see it doesn't show that at all. The food (especially frying) swamps differences between electric vs gas ranges, which themselves aren't even significant.
I wonder how much of the gunk is still in my lungs.
I took apart mine and completely greased all the fittings and put the proper type of teflon tape. Feel way better. Confirmed there are zero leaks now
Propane is probably purer than straight-up NG, but it's exhaust is still exhaust.
getting radon out does not cost money
Probably other toxins are more important: mercury vapor and hydrogen sulfide are usually mentioned. Hydrocarbons other than methane may burn to carbon monoxide or soot. Gas is said to get much less processing before delivery than it used to.
SpaceX will probably purify theirs before pumping it aboard, just to increase the useful life of their Raptor engines.
Best case you have a hood that vents to the outside. Hoods really work
If the vent moves more than a certain amount of CFM air, then an exchange system is required, but that takes almost a restaurant grade vent to get to.
Yes, I believe there are studies that have found households that use detergents to wash their dishes have significantly high rates of allergies than households that only hand wash dishes. After hearing that, I started trying to try to avoid using detergent when possible. I think it makes a lot of sense-- really the majority of the powerful chemical detergents we use in the home are mostly unnecessary. They're just bound to leave residue that enters our bodies
If you look it up, gut epithelial barrier basically means the mucosal lining.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intestinal_mucosal_barrier
Mucus is mostly water, some salt and some biopolymers.
Mucus can vary slightly depending on what part of the body produces it, but typically it is made up of 98 percent water, 1 percent salt and 1 percent biopolymers—very long molecules that interact with one another and give mucus that gel-like quality.
https://healthtalk.unchealthcare.org/mucus-our-bodys-silent-...
If you add chemicals to what is essentially saline solution, it shouldn't be shocking that the solution changes. The decreased electrical resistance is likely some kind of salt derangement from what I gather.
And the biopolymers in mucus are apparently called mucins and -- quick and dirty -- these seem to be glycoproteins, as is true of many immune related things in the human body.
Does some one know if alcohol ethoxylates are a type of nonylphenol ethoxylates? Some brief searching implies these may be separate things.
From the article:
> Q2. How are NP/NPEs used?
> NPs/NPEs, which are produced in large volumes, are used for industrial processes and in consumer laundry detergents, personal hygiene, automotive, latex paints, and lawn care products.
> Q6. What are the potential risks to people?
> NP has been detected in human breast milk, blood, and urine and is associated with reproductive and developmental effects in rodents.
> Q7. Is there an easy way for consumers to avoid using products with NP/NPEs?
> Consumers can avoid products with NP/NPEs by looking for products with EPA’s Safer Choice Label on the shelves of major retailers. …
1: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-t...
Interestingly, detergent residue from professional dishwashers demonstrated the remnant of a significant amount of cytotoxic and epithelial barrier–damaging rinse aid remaining on washed and ready-to-use dishware.
Is the reader to draw the conclusion that significant levels of rinse-aid are not found in dishes cleaned by home dishwashers?
A professional dishwasher completes 1 or 2 wash and rinse cycles using 3.5 L of water per cycle.
That's about 1/4 the water usage of a home dishwasher. Does an increased amount of water in home dishwashers result in negligible levels of rinse-aid?
With most home dishwashers, I have seen evidence of leftovers.
I never had that before starting in Google, and I always was able to pretty much eat what I want.
Now I don't think it's the food, which is great (and I have been experimenting to see if I could narrow it down). But this article makes me think it might be the cutlery and plates! Or maybe the glasses and cups?
Any other Googlers here with similar issues?
My suspicion is that modern dishwashers use too little water.
A colleague has his own coffee cup with a custom design, which he hand-washes. I might do the same.
If I then rinse it a couple times and try again, I see a few bubbles which quickly dissipate.
A rough calculation would seem to indicate that a complete rinse-only cycle would reduce residue levels to well into the safety zone but at the cost of double the water and possibly double the power (if hot water were used).
If this became a widespread concern and people acted this way then it wouldn't bode well for water conservation efforts.
Compare that to a 2.2 gallon per minute water/efficient kitchen faucet where you’ll approach the amount of water consumed by your triple cycle load after just 5 minutes of leaving your water running.
IIRC 10l / cycle is a standard set in the EU, but I can’t find a reference right now.
derp. If it was toxic on my clothes, I wondered what I was eating.
People think I’m crazy to not have a dishwasher or microwave.
Not to mention a burrito wrapped in plastic…
You are what you eat.
So... what happens?
Then there's the topic of items that are safe to use only in ideal conditions. Like Teflon in cookware that is said to be very safe unless it overheats, chips, or degrades in some way.
The more I think about this, the more it sounds like a blind spot for most people. So I'd like to know whether heated-up washing-up detergent/dishwasher detergent is associated with something unhealthy in a proven (or reasonable) way.
You should be avoiding storing consumables in plastics as much as possible. At that point microwaves become perfectly safe.
I ended up buying more rinse aid and then running the milky dishes through a cycle with about a 1/4 cup of coffee machine cleaner (citric acid) thrown in.
Our water comes from a local lake and an underground aquifer surrounded in limestone if you are curious.
Citric acid [1]
1 - https://www.thespruce.com/homemade-dishwasher-rinse-aid-1388...
https://www.southernliving.com/home/organization/dishwasher-...
I always sanitized my baby’s bottles, either via boiling water or via sanitizing steam bag.
But also, yes rinse them after washing them, also use a baby bottle detergent instead of "full strength" or whatever.
And then sterilise them.
I don't use rinse aid, never have, you don't actually need it, you can just let the dishes air dry for slightly longer.
If you have hard water then soften it, rather than use a rinse aid.
PS I have no chemical expertise, but the article singles out alcohol ethoxylates as the cause of this damage. And while I don't use rinse aid in my home dishwasher, my Cascade dishwasher pods list "Isotridecanol Ethoxylated" as an ingredient, which may be one of these substances? At least this gets rinsed off, though I doubt it gets rinsed completely.
Home dishwashers attempt to remove food residue with enzymes (also no soap).
It does not get rinsed off. The hope is that it drips off the dishes, but some will remain and then dry. Does this ingredient dry? I don't know.
(There are also sulfates that are aren't AES, such as sodium sulfate, which appears in many powdered dishwasher detergents. I doubt this has the same effect, so it's incorrect to just blame "sulfates".)
I think you need to learn the gloriously liberating feeling of admitting you were wrong.
many sulfates are not surfactants
none of the numerous meanings in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AES are in any way related to surfactants or sulfates
many sulfates and surfactants are not 'harmful' as generally understood (though there's probably a lethal dose of any of them)
why are you posting this misinformation here
why are you posting this egregious misinformation here
So basically do not dishwash plastic stuff.
I don't mean to sound like a pleb, but the biggest lesson of the past two centuries is how much people bluff, use the name of 'science, progress, blah blah' to push for their own profits, regardless of actual consequences (bodily or environmentally or ecologically).
I generally stick to old-school goods that are totally natural, cheap and are still massively produced in India. With the 'generic' stuff, half the shit is made from tortured-killed cows (urgh vomits) (admittedly, this is mostly outside India), and all of them are filled with god knows what, and made from god knows what.
If you're India, check out Patanjali's ash and lime dishwasher soap that cost like Rs. 20 per bar. Shout out to FitTuber on Youtube who reviews a lot organic products from India.
You seem to be taking a diss at science. The point of science is to learn more about things, whether they are old school or modern. Science does not discriminate. People of course bluff in the name of profits for their own gain, but if you do not have knowledge about the things, you won't be able to call out the bluff.
I think other animals are used just as much (if not more) in industrial processes, I assure you there's no conspiracy to specifically oppress cows.
On the other hand if we were to learn that these synthesized products were actually good for you that would be surprising.
better robotics tech can reduce chemical use by:
1. spot application of sponge in place of general application of chemicals
2. more targeted application of chemicals (only when + where needed)
3. replacing poison for pest / weed elimination with smart mobile traps (have seen laser POCs for both bugs + weeds)
4. cleaning materials for recycling using targeted friction instead of soap. separating oil and food scraps from drain water. separating human waste from gray water (and selling the nitrates)
even for something innocuous like brushing your teeth, a robot can use advanced sensing to modify the dose of fluoride
feels like lots of 'bits to atoms' projects here for someone who enjoys garbage
Maybe you just worked with/for terrible people?
Also, if you drink it, you will certainly die.
I see the bubbles foaming at the edges of my cups when I fill them with water, so I always rinse them before use. I would avoid most dishwasher detergent pods if I could, but I can't sell the idea to my significant other.
White vinegar is a very different product: it is not a surfactant, it is an acid. It means that it doesn't help rinsing, but it can remove scale. Both can prevent white stains, but the mechanism is very different.
If it works just as well, why don't dishwasher manufacturers use acids instead of rinse aid? You can argue that white vinegar is cheap and they they prefer you use expensive detergents so that they can make profit, but they could also sell you expensive acids, so I don't think it is the reason.
So what to do with it? Personally, I still use rinse aid because it is what the manufacturer recommends, and I have no better idea. It is not a significant expense, and according to the study, not as much as a problem with household dishwashers as it is with professional dishwashers (very different machines using different products).
Sodium Sulfate Sodium Carbonate Water Copolymer Of Acrylic Maleic And Sulphonic Acids Sodium Silicate Sodium Carbonate Peroxide PEG/PPG/Propylheptyl Ether Fragrances Subtilisin Amylase Enzyme Transitional Metal Catalyst Reactive Green 12 Copolymer Of Acrylic Maleic And Sulphonic Acids
This is probably some kind of detergent, although there are lots of different sulphonic acids.
IANAD, but it worked for me.
I don't bother; I've tried it and haven't observed any effects.
Also I'm very suspicious when I fill a glass and it comes out foamy, I rinse them again before drinking from it
You probably confused them with ethoxysulfates, which are a related but different class of chemicals.
The harm done by EAS was previously established by these same researchers and referenced in the paper: "Our recent studies have demonstrated that exposure to anionic surfactants in laundry detergents impairs the epithelial barrier functions in human skin and bronchial epithelial cells even at very high dilutions."
"Anionic surfactants" AKA sulfates, sulfonates, phosphates.
The EA are nonionic, by comparison, but do the same damage to the gut or any other part of the epithelium.
https://www.ipcol.com/wp-content/uploads/SURFACTANT-TYPES.jp...
Try and see if you have a B vitamin deficiency, it leads to slower regeneration of the lining.
It would be like my college apartment kitchen, so you could hire me as manager.
*you might die of other causes, though