> You identified 12 of 14 (85%) AI-generated images.
> You identified 14 of 16 (87%) human-made images.
In general, I followed a pretty simple rule:
- If it's a photograph, it's likely human if there're no immediate imperfections
- If it's an illustration, it's AI if the art has imperfections OR if it's anime-adjacent (example: images with glossy lighting on human skin)
Right now, SD-based art is trending towards a particular art style (anime-like & 3D-ish art), with little inherent ability towards creating subtle details in the background. It has a hard time drawing hands correctly, and often fails in drawing reflections. It also seems to have a hard time creating flat illustrations, or illustrations with limited color palates.