Pretty sure I was told that the louder group is the one that is the winner.
P.S. I hope that the author sincerely regrets making this comic.
>Do you leave it alone and thus allow Group A's freedom of speech be effectively suppressed or intervene and suppress Group B? Either way, somebody's free speech is being violated.
Currently China is doing just that, drowning out the protests with a flood of louder voices. https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/28/tech/twitter-china-protests-s...
Is that free speech?
>All that comic says is that being told "no" and "you're wrong" and people disagreeing with you isn't a violation of your free speech.
From the text of the comic: >If you're yelled at(which includes heckling), boycotted, have your show canceled(otherwise known as fired), or get banned from an Internet community, your free speech rights aren't being violated.
Formatting mine.
That is a tad more than just being told 'no' or 'your wrong', isn't it. It is normalizing attacking the other.
I stand by what I said, the comic is bad and I hope that the author feels bad about it.