Chrome and Firefox have a review team for their extension marketplace, though I believe there are instances of malicious extensions getting through anyway.
And while rather labor intensive, another path toward vetting is examining the source code. I haven't obfuscated it, and Googling for "view extension source code" has many results.
And for what it's worth, I can give an assurance that I'm not a bad actor.
Maybe relevant: https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~rdriley/487/papers/Thompson_1984_Ref...
Regardless I love the idea of this.
Not as easy in Chrome, but there's ways to do it. For example here's one: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/chromium-extensio...
Has this Firefox extension been reviewed? because most don't get reviewed
Download files and read and modify the browser’s download history — Required to export data.
Store unlimited amount of client-side data — Required to save sticky note data locally.
Access your data for all websites — Required to load sticky notes on any page.If I need sync, I'd prefer not to rely on the extension for that. Why would I pay for my own cloud service AND a separate payment for random apps that use their own sync? Most people have their own online storage, and should always be the number 1 way to backup things like personal notes.
In my mind, the sync feature for this app is less about backup and more about maintaining a single instance across multiple computers/browsers.
uBlock Origin is the only "access your data for all websites" extension I use.