Unsurprisingly, that seems extremely murky to me. If the Israelis had a problem with Bull, why didn't they take it up with Canada or even the US, who would have given them a friendly hearing and been able to find ways to stop Bull without assassination? I mean, a few mill in the bank and a cushy ballistics research job at Lockheed would seem to be reasonable. What am I missing?
Their extrajudicial killings are about sending a message, not stopping one particular person. This is a half century old policy at this point.
Im not stating any pro or anti statement on Israeli policy here, but if your policy is to send a message by assassination and you spend half a century doing it, perhaps the message is not getting through.