If you're going to tell me you're any kind of "governance" advisor to a company that defrauded people to the tune of billions, I am not going to pretend you are somehow not partially liable.
People endorsing products have zero inputs in the decision making processes that lead to these meltdowns so I don’t really see how they can be held accountable.
Or the marketing person who created / managed an Instagram campaign?
Or the IT staff who setup notebooks and a VPN/firewall?
None of these (or many others) was even involved in the core product or are expected to know anything about financial regulations.
There is a reason that usually only senor leadership is involved in such suits.
There are exceptions to that rule of course