> it's hard to detect any rational point.

Really? I think I detected at least:

1. This moral panic is either overblown or wildly inconsistent.

2. If it's impossible to imagine the same kind of government restriction being proposed for aging adults, why accept it for other groups?

> Digital is far more addictive, radicalizing, privacy-invading and exploitative compared to TV.

Or perhaps the unidirectional nature of TV consumption makes for powerful radicalizing propaganda--especially to an at-home group with fewer external connections to ground them--and the passivity of the consumption rots your brain and dries up critical thinking.