> The article isn't saying the highest bid is 60cents/$. It's saying this was the lowest bid. Very weasel way to put it, intentionally trying to mislead. They seemingly got you.
Order of magnitude wise this doesn't change the point. Why the snark?
Order of magnitude wise this doesn't change the point. Why the snark?
I feel like you're smart enough to read it for yourself and come to the same conclusion. Being fooled by tricks like this should be taken with the pain which it is. That is to say, no pain except for intellectual or cognitive pain. You can now read your source for what it is.
I have provided you a cognitive inoculation today.
From the articles I've read, its anonymous sources from unnamed banks. It's far from a fact.