Show HN: Comparing Open Source Projects
ossrank.com
ossrank.com
Combining commits + contributors is my favorite (obviously!), especially when considered over a long time range.
Yes, some (usually smaller) teams make small incremental commits, others have more ceremony and commits tend to be less frequent and bigger. And you could easily game the system theoretically, but not easily in a project of important and substance.
We've added a voting system, where we give every dev 20 votes, and we'd give more notable OSS contributors a higher weighting, but it's very early days for that — but we'd mix that data into the score if we had it.
How would you do it? We're open to suggestions :)
I'm the core maintainer of an open-source smart home software (https://github.com/GladysAssistant/Gladys, 2.2k stars, has been existing since 2014), and is not listed, any reason why? :)
We've added Gladys Assistant @ https://ossrank.com/p/2035
Don't get me wrong, the site looks great and graphs are slick. But not particularly insightful.
https://ossrank.com/compare?project_id=1472&projects=1906%2C...
I've never used either framework; would you agree with that assessment from other signals you've seen?
Looks like Actix dropped off a lot since Nikolay Kim stepped away from the project (no commits for past year https://ossrank.com/p/1906-actix)
I added it for you though @ https://ossrank.com/p/2037 (1000 isn't the real rank, will take a few hours to get ranked, we rescore projects every 3 hours)
#MVP
Could you add our open source project: https://github.com/refinedev/refine