> in the United States, your job is very closely tied to your livelihood
Has there been a time or place where this isn't the case?
To quote Karl Marx "He who does not work does not eat."
Has there been a time or place where this isn't the case?
To quote Karl Marx "He who does not work does not eat."
Overall I think there’s a decent compromise to be found there. I am happy for the society to ensure that as many people as possible have a guaranteed bare minimum to survive, which provides opportunities to find better. If some people are content with surviving, well. More power to them. They are not in big enough numbers to matter anyway (the sums involved are dwarfed by companies’ tax fraud).
Some countries (Germany, Switzerland, maybe others) will pay employment insurance even if you quit of your own accord and lower the elimination period if you had reasons to do so (as certified by a MD)
That was Lenin who wrote that, although it was originally from the Bible.
your survival being predicated upon engaging in state-enforced financial exploitation by a capitalist and being separated from the value of your own labor
isnt quite the same as
engaging in activities deaigned to produced a beneficial outcome to the self and society at a point in the future